Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23911 - 23920 of 63406 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 23911 - 23920 of 63406 for Motion for joint custody.
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion for a new trial. The issue is whether the supreme court’s decision in State v. Dubose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33525 - 2008-07-28
postconviction motion for a new trial. The issue is whether the supreme court’s decision in State v. Dubose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33525 - 2008-07-28
State v. Dean C. Trepanier
an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Trepanier argues the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26060 - 2006-07-31
an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Trepanier argues the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26060 - 2006-07-31
State v. Terry Lee Paul
denying his motion for modification of his twenty-five-year sentence and denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12585 - 2005-03-31
denying his motion for modification of his twenty-five-year sentence and denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12585 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
postconviction motion without a hearing. Green argues that the circuit court’s plea colloquy did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=325654 - 2021-01-20
postconviction motion without a hearing. Green argues that the circuit court’s plea colloquy did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=325654 - 2021-01-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of conviction and an order denying his postconviction motion. He seeks to withdraw his no contest plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259151 - 2020-05-06
of conviction and an order denying his postconviction motion. He seeks to withdraw his no contest plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259151 - 2020-05-06
State v. Carl E. Nelson
)(a).[1] Nelson argues the trial court erred by denying his suppression motion because the police lacked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18275 - 2005-05-23
)(a).[1] Nelson argues the trial court erred by denying his suppression motion because the police lacked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18275 - 2005-05-23
CA Blank Order
as a sexually violent person (SVP) was denied without a hearing. His motion for reconsideration also
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108794 - 2014-03-11
as a sexually violent person (SVP) was denied without a hearing. His motion for reconsideration also
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108794 - 2014-03-11
CA Blank Order
discovery or its summary judgment motion, summary judgment was appropriate. We affirm. We review decisions
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104474 - 2013-11-19
discovery or its summary judgment motion, summary judgment was appropriate. We affirm. We review decisions
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104474 - 2013-11-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
The notice of appeal also purports to appeal an order denying Wilcoxson’s postconviction motion. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28465 - 2014-09-15
The notice of appeal also purports to appeal an order denying Wilcoxson’s postconviction motion. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28465 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
by the husband at any time. ¶3 In 2010, Mitzi filed a notice of motion and motion for contempt against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72166 - 2011-10-11
by the husband at any time. ¶3 In 2010, Mitzi filed a notice of motion and motion for contempt against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72166 - 2011-10-11