Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23911 - 23920 of 29713 for des.
Search results 23911 - 23920 of 29713 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
(1985). The question is one of law for our de novo review. See State v. Harrell, 2008 WI App 37, ¶37
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97330 - 2014-09-15
(1985). The question is one of law for our de novo review. See State v. Harrell, 2008 WI App 37, ¶37
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97330 - 2014-09-15
State v. Darcy Stafford
that performance prejudiced the defense, are questions of law which we review de novo. State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11541 - 2005-03-31
that performance prejudiced the defense, are questions of law which we review de novo. State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11541 - 2005-03-31
Curtis J. Frahm v. General Motors Corporation
indemnity provisions. A circuit court’s interpretation of a contract also is subject to our de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4494 - 2005-03-31
indemnity provisions. A circuit court’s interpretation of a contract also is subject to our de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4494 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Whether the initial joinder was proper is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Locke, 177
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155861 - 2017-09-21
. Whether the initial joinder was proper is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Locke, 177
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155861 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Mary Ann Jones v. The Estate of Robert G. Jones
a question of statutory interpretation and contract interpretation, which we review de novo, but benefiting
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16495 - 2017-09-21
a question of statutory interpretation and contract interpretation, which we review de novo, but benefiting
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16495 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
de novo. Id. “A defendant who requests resentencing due to the circuit court’s use of inaccurate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33656 - 2008-08-05
de novo. Id. “A defendant who requests resentencing due to the circuit court’s use of inaccurate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33656 - 2008-08-05
[PDF]
State v. Robert L. King
a de novo standard on the second step. The reason we decided in Lopez to employ the “clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12523 - 2017-09-21
a de novo standard on the second step. The reason we decided in Lopez to employ the “clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12523 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Frontsheet
Interpreting and applying Wis. Stat. § 973.046 presents a question of law, which we review de novo. CED
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214321 - 2018-06-15
Interpreting and applying Wis. Stat. § 973.046 presents a question of law, which we review de novo. CED
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214321 - 2018-06-15
[PDF]
Cassandra Sherrill Patterson v. Lynns Waste Paper Co.
treatment of this woman in light of Dr. Dahl’s opinion as to the de minimus nature of her injuries and Dr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10134 - 2017-09-19
treatment of this woman in light of Dr. Dahl’s opinion as to the de minimus nature of her injuries and Dr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10134 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law we review de novo. Jeannie M.P., 286 Wis. 2d 721, ¶6. ¶13 Gilmore asserts that his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118314 - 2014-09-15
of law we review de novo. Jeannie M.P., 286 Wis. 2d 721, ¶6. ¶13 Gilmore asserts that his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118314 - 2014-09-15