Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23911 - 23920 of 57878 for id.
Search results 23911 - 23920 of 57878 for id.
[PDF]
NOTICE
establish that counsel’s conduct fell below an objective standard of reasonableness. Id. at 687-88
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39904 - 2014-09-15
establish that counsel’s conduct fell below an objective standard of reasonableness. Id. at 687-88
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39904 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
the opposing party to a trial. Id., ¶24. We view the materials in the light most favorable to the party
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34767 - 2014-09-15
the opposing party to a trial. Id., ¶24. We view the materials in the light most favorable to the party
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34767 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Jamie Lee Moore
. State, 34 Wis.2d 278, 149 N.W.2d 557 (1967). Id. (citation omitted). Trial counsel opposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9928 - 2017-09-19
. State, 34 Wis.2d 278, 149 N.W.2d 557 (1967). Id. (citation omitted). Trial counsel opposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9928 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
it was then in existence, it was unknowingly overlooked by all of the parties.” Id. at 8 (quoting Rosado v. State, 70
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27498 - 2014-09-15
it was then in existence, it was unknowingly overlooked by all of the parties.” Id. at 8 (quoting Rosado v. State, 70
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27498 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
” to tell a lie. See id. No. 2018AP869-CR 5 statute, WIS. STAT. § 972.11, “because it isn’t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231772 - 2019-01-08
” to tell a lie. See id. No. 2018AP869-CR 5 statute, WIS. STAT. § 972.11, “because it isn’t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231772 - 2019-01-08
[PDF]
NOTICE
is grounded in specific articulable facts and reasonable inferences from those facts. Id., ¶8. ¶10 When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35982 - 2014-09-15
is grounded in specific articulable facts and reasonable inferences from those facts. Id., ¶8. ¶10 When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35982 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Andres Godina
and with the requirement that the defendant must show some unreasonable basis for the sentence. See id. at 565, 431 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13092 - 2017-09-21
and with the requirement that the defendant must show some unreasonable basis for the sentence. See id. at 565, 431 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13092 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Appeal No. 2009AP3073-CR Cir. Ct. No. 2007CT1130
of another.” Id. The trial court agreed with the State that Melendez-Diaz was distinguishable
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96661 - 2014-09-15
of another.” Id. The trial court agreed with the State that Melendez-Diaz was distinguishable
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96661 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Kenyatta Thigpen
the declarant is unavailable. See id. Here, Thigpen argues that Butler was unavailable because he exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16038 - 2017-09-21
the declarant is unavailable. See id. Here, Thigpen argues that Butler was unavailable because he exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16038 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law we review de novo. Id. If the motion does raise such facts, the circuit court must hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139718 - 2017-09-21
of law we review de novo. Id. If the motion does raise such facts, the circuit court must hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139718 - 2017-09-21