Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23911 - 23920 of 63934 for records/1000.
Search results 23911 - 23920 of 63934 for records/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
809.32. Johnson did not file a response. Based upon our review of the no-merit report and the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216170 - 2018-07-24
809.32. Johnson did not file a response. Based upon our review of the no-merit report and the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216170 - 2018-07-24
CA Blank Order
of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because there is no arguable merit to any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123440 - 2014-10-14
of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because there is no arguable merit to any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123440 - 2014-10-14
State v. Michelle L. Denzer
, for the record, I would like to object on behalf of the State.” Not only was the objection general, failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15859 - 2005-03-31
, for the record, I would like to object on behalf of the State.” Not only was the objection general, failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15859 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and has not responded. Upon independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=198080 - 2017-10-24
and has not responded. Upon independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=198080 - 2017-10-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2020AP709-CRNM 2 not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=585956 - 2022-11-08
. No. 2020AP709-CRNM 2 not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=585956 - 2022-11-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of Richmond and Town of Johnston. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260106 - 2020-05-13
of Richmond and Town of Johnston. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260106 - 2020-05-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the records contain requests for the appointment of counsel and orders appointing counsel with respect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247459 - 2019-09-26
the records contain requests for the appointment of counsel and orders appointing counsel with respect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247459 - 2019-09-26
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of the record, we agree with counsel’s assessment that there are no arguably meritorious appellate issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94892 - 2014-09-15
of the record, we agree with counsel’s assessment that there are no arguably meritorious appellate issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94892 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, was advised of his right to file a response, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263261 - 2020-06-09
, was advised of his right to file a response, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263261 - 2020-06-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable basis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189786 - 2017-09-21
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable basis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189786 - 2017-09-21