Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23921 - 23930 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 23921 - 23930 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
COURT OF APPEALS
erred in denying the Decosters’ motion that he recuse himself from further proceedings. For the reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137854 - 2015-03-18
erred in denying the Decosters’ motion that he recuse himself from further proceedings. For the reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137854 - 2015-03-18
[PDF]
NOTICE
an order that denied his postconviction motion for plea withdrawal. Graham contends that his pleas were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36772 - 2014-09-15
an order that denied his postconviction motion for plea withdrawal. Graham contends that his pleas were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36772 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Karl H. Amenson
., and Peterson, J. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Karl Amenson appeals an order denying his motion to withdraw his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5381 - 2017-09-19
., and Peterson, J. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Karl Amenson appeals an order denying his motion to withdraw his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5381 - 2017-09-19
Daniel S. Stasiewicz v. Juan Pagan, Jr.
by June 1, 2000, and that all pretrial motions were to be filed by May 1, 2000. The final pretrial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3882 - 2005-03-31
by June 1, 2000, and that all pretrial motions were to be filed by May 1, 2000. The final pretrial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3882 - 2005-03-31
Daniel S. Stasiewicz v. Juan Pagan, Jr.
by June 1, 2000, and that all pretrial motions were to be filed by May 1, 2000. The final pretrial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3881 - 2005-03-31
by June 1, 2000, and that all pretrial motions were to be filed by May 1, 2000. The final pretrial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3881 - 2005-03-31
Wisconsin Court System - Headlines archive
motion claiming ineffective assistance of counsel is procedurally barred as a successive motion under Wis
/news/archives/view.jsp?id=400&year=2012
motion claiming ineffective assistance of counsel is procedurally barred as a successive motion under Wis
/news/archives/view.jsp?id=400&year=2012
CA Blank Order
appeals from an order denying her postconviction motion for sentence modification. Appellate counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134578 - 2015-02-03
appeals from an order denying her postconviction motion for sentence modification. Appellate counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134578 - 2015-02-03
[PDF]
, to grant Beaudoin’s motion to reopen a default judgment that it had entered against him after he failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=701501 - 2023-09-13
, to grant Beaudoin’s motion to reopen a default judgment that it had entered against him after he failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=701501 - 2023-09-13
Eternalist Foundation, Inc. v. City of Platteville
. The City moved to dismiss the Foundation’s complaint. The trial court deemed the City’s motion to be one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14232 - 2005-03-31
. The City moved to dismiss the Foundation’s complaint. The trial court deemed the City’s motion to be one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14232 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Eternalist Foundation, Inc. v. City of Platteville
the Foundation’s complaint. The trial court deemed the City’s motion to be one for summary judgment and granted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14232 - 2014-09-15
the Foundation’s complaint. The trial court deemed the City’s motion to be one for summary judgment and granted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14232 - 2014-09-15