Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23931 - 23940 of 61139 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 23931 - 23940 of 61139 for quit claim deed/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to confront and cross-examine the victim. Johnson’s current claim is barred because it has been previously
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176202 - 2017-09-21
to confront and cross-examine the victim. Johnson’s current claim is barred because it has been previously
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176202 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
an Alford plea. He claims that: (1) he should have been allowed to withdraw his plea prior to sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51519 - 2010-06-30
an Alford plea. He claims that: (1) he should have been allowed to withdraw his plea prior to sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51519 - 2010-06-30
[PDF]
96-14 Amendment of SCR (Proposed) SCR 70,40
determine the indigency of the prisoner and decide whether it states a claim upon which the court may
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1196 - 2017-09-19
determine the indigency of the prisoner and decide whether it states a claim upon which the court may
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1196 - 2017-09-19
[MS WORD]
SC-5300VA: Stipulation for Dismissal Eviction (Small Claims)
for Dismissal Eviction (Small Claims) Case No. The parties who have signed this stipulation
/formdisplay/SC-5300VA.doc?formNumber=SC-5300VA&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2025-03-11
for Dismissal Eviction (Small Claims) Case No. The parties who have signed this stipulation
/formdisplay/SC-5300VA.doc?formNumber=SC-5300VA&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2025-03-11
[PDF]
State v. Edward L. Hennings
. Because Hennings’s claim is procedurally barred, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 In October 1996, Hennings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20544 - 2017-09-21
. Because Hennings’s claim is procedurally barred, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 In October 1996, Hennings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20544 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Charles R. Hall
based on the testimony presented to it. ¶4 To establish an ineffective assistance of counsel claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7290 - 2017-09-20
based on the testimony presented to it. ¶4 To establish an ineffective assistance of counsel claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7290 - 2017-09-20
State v. Edward L. Hennings
Hennings’s claim is procedurally barred, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 In October 1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20544 - 2005-12-12
Hennings’s claim is procedurally barred, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 In October 1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20544 - 2005-12-12
96-14 Amendment of SCR (Proposed) SCR 70,40
the indigency of the prisoner and decide whether it states a claim upon which the court may grant relief
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1196 - 2005-03-31
the indigency of the prisoner and decide whether it states a claim upon which the court may grant relief
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1196 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert D. Hendrix
this claim under State v. Escalona-Naranjo, 185 Wis.2d 168, 517 N.W.2d 157 (1994). We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9644 - 2005-03-31
this claim under State v. Escalona-Naranjo, 185 Wis.2d 168, 517 N.W.2d 157 (1994). We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9644 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. David W. Pender
, Pender attempted to withdraw his plea. He claimed that he NO. 96-2807-CR 2 had a valid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11500 - 2017-09-19
, Pender attempted to withdraw his plea. He claimed that he NO. 96-2807-CR 2 had a valid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11500 - 2017-09-19