Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23941 - 23950 of 29810 for des.

COURT OF APPEALS
is deficient or prejudicial is a question of law we review de novo. Jeannie M.P., 286 Wis. 2d 721, ¶6. ¶13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118314 - 2014-07-29

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Goethems now appeal. DISCUSSION ¶16 We review de novo the grant of summary judgment, employing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=278767 - 2020-08-18

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
unless they are clearly erroneous, but review de novo whether those facts warrant suppression. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93377 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI App 171
the change is substantial is a question of law which we review de novo. Dahlke v. Dahlke, 2002 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29379 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
unless they are clearly erroneous but review de novo whether those facts warrant suppression. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175636 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI App 61
of law de novo. Id. ¶11 Competency to proceed in this context—i.e., when a party fails to comply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248293 - 2019-12-06

State v. Romell Lampley
sentence on numerous grounds. He also requested a de novo sentencing hearing for the purpose of presenting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2342 - 2005-03-31

2007 WI APP 28
is a question of law we review de novo. Grube v. Daun, 173 Wis. 2d 30, 72, 496 N.W.2d 106 (Ct. App. 1992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27840 - 2007-02-27

Barron County v. Kathy S.
of law that this court reviews de novo. See id. at 862, 537 N.W.2d at 49‑50. ¶21 Kathy claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15970 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the deficiency was prejudicial are questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d 121
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143066 - 2017-09-21