Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23951 - 23960 of 30059 for de.
Search results 23951 - 23960 of 30059 for de.
State v. Crystal L. Bizzle
is a question of statutory interpretation which we review de novo. See State v. Muniz, 181 Wis.2d 928, 931, 512
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12990 - 2005-03-31
is a question of statutory interpretation which we review de novo. See State v. Muniz, 181 Wis.2d 928, 931, 512
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12990 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
are not in dispute on this issue. “Custody” therefore is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30376 - 2007-09-25
are not in dispute on this issue. “Custody” therefore is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30376 - 2007-09-25
County of Ozaukee v. Nancy L. Quelle
of law which we review de novo. See State v. Hagaman, 133 Wis.2d 381, 384-85, 395 N.W.2d 617, 618 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8935 - 2005-03-31
of law which we review de novo. See State v. Hagaman, 133 Wis.2d 381, 384-85, 395 N.W.2d 617, 618 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8935 - 2005-03-31
Erik Jensen v. David D. McPherson, M.D.
involves the interpretation of a statute, a question of law which we review de novo. See Agnes T. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4533 - 2005-03-31
involves the interpretation of a statute, a question of law which we review de novo. See Agnes T. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4533 - 2005-03-31
State v. Justice C. Granger
, whether a defendant’s Miranda rights were violated is a constitutional fact that we determine de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13476 - 2005-03-31
, whether a defendant’s Miranda rights were violated is a constitutional fact that we determine de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13476 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Peter R. Martel
to conditions of probation and sex-offender registration, which is a question of law that we review de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16639 - 2017-09-21
to conditions of probation and sex-offender registration, which is a question of law that we review de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16639 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
James A. Rehrauer v. City of Milwaukee
Wis. 2d at 489, our review is de novo, id. If we conclude that the circuit court granted summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2875 - 2017-09-19
Wis. 2d at 489, our review is de novo, id. If we conclude that the circuit court granted summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2875 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
we review de novo. Buhler, 139 Wis. 2d at 198. “No motion challenging the sufficiency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144455 - 2017-09-21
we review de novo. Buhler, 139 Wis. 2d at 198. “No motion challenging the sufficiency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144455 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. 2d 217, 738 N.W.2d 114 (citation omitted). We review de novo the trial court’s determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242977 - 2019-07-02
. 2d 217, 738 N.W.2d 114 (citation omitted). We review de novo the trial court’s determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242977 - 2019-07-02
Betty Butler v. AAA Life Insurance Company
. ¶7 Our review of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. See Green Spring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14764 - 2005-03-31
. ¶7 Our review of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. See Green Spring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14764 - 2005-03-31