Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23981 - 23990 of 68967 for had.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
The first and third counts for OMVWOC were based on Moffett driving a 2013 blue Honda Accord, which had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=394037 - 2021-07-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the sister’s No. 2014AP2389 2 ownership of some assets that had belonged to their parents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143772 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI App 41
because he argues that no factual basis exists for his plea. ¶2 Stewart had, in a previous case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214441 - 2018-08-13

[PDF] Randie Rowell v. Aldred Ash
the mobile home park from the Ashes for $335,000. The Ashes had agreed to reduce the price from $350,000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14609 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
and that they waived any right to argue they had an interest in the Trust. ¶8 Barbara then filed the instant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238398 - 2019-04-02

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
was questioned by police, W.D. told them that Linder was not at his house and that Linder had confessed to him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=319989 - 2021-01-05

Randie Rowell v. Aldred Ash
the mobile home park from the Ashes for $335,000. The Ashes had agreed to reduce the price from $350,000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14609 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Federal Insurance Company v. Grunau Project Development, Inc.
in Schlitz Park, which had most recently been used as commercial office space by Time Warner Cable. A new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25384 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Jonas Doyle Carter v. Crystal Marie Carter
that the parties had stipulated to the division of household furniture, furnishings, and personal property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7442 - 2017-09-20

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 14, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
because: (1) the court’s grant of summary judgment had nullified the dissolution, and the court presumed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28425 - 2007-03-13