Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23991 - 24000 of 30246 for de.
Search results 23991 - 24000 of 30246 for de.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law for de novo review. Id., ¶26. ¶9 Krueger argues that he made the requisite prima facie
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190871 - 2017-09-21
of law for de novo review. Id., ¶26. ¶9 Krueger argues that he made the requisite prima facie
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190871 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that, if true, would entitle the defendant to relief.” Id., ¶14. This is a question of law subject to de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108906 - 2017-09-21
that, if true, would entitle the defendant to relief.” Id., ¶14. This is a question of law subject to de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108906 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
¶14 We review de novo the circuit court’s decision to deny James’ petition for discharge filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699307 - 2023-09-06
¶14 We review de novo the circuit court’s decision to deny James’ petition for discharge filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699307 - 2023-09-06
State v. David J. Cleveland
exists in a given case is a question of constitutional law which we review de novo.” Id. We analyze
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16108 - 2005-03-31
exists in a given case is a question of constitutional law which we review de novo.” Id. We analyze
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16108 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI App 44
.2d 449 (1977)). We apply de novo review to the interpretation of a prior order of judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264682 - 2020-08-11
.2d 449 (1977)). We apply de novo review to the interpretation of a prior order of judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264682 - 2020-08-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo.” J.W.J., 375 Wis. 2d 542, ¶15. 6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1001570 - 2025-08-26
review de novo.” J.W.J., 375 Wis. 2d 542, ¶15. 6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1001570 - 2025-08-26
[PDF]
State v. Clarence Givens
, not a factual one,’” which we review de novo. United States v. Davis, 15 F.3d 1393, 1415 (7th Cir. 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12420 - 2017-09-21
, not a factual one,’” which we review de novo. United States v. Davis, 15 F.3d 1393, 1415 (7th Cir. 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12420 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
constitutional right to a fair trial and thus presents a question of law, which we review de novo. Id., ¶20
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53723 - 2014-09-15
constitutional right to a fair trial and thus presents a question of law, which we review de novo. Id., ¶20
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53723 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Lisa A. Carter
only a single $20 fee. This presents a question of statutory interpretation that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14142 - 2014-09-15
only a single $20 fee. This presents a question of statutory interpretation that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14142 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
requires interpretation of the statutes, which is a matter of law we review de novo. See Frisch v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106010 - 2013-12-26
requires interpretation of the statutes, which is a matter of law we review de novo. See Frisch v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106010 - 2013-12-26