Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23991 - 24000 of 64027 for records/1000.
Search results 23991 - 24000 of 64027 for records/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=375334 - 2021-06-09
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=375334 - 2021-06-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree with counsel’s assessment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=484167 - 2022-02-16
reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree with counsel’s assessment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=484167 - 2022-02-16
[PDF]
State v. James L. Kirk
attorney did not provide him with discovery under WIS. STAT. § 971.23. The record belies this claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6644 - 2017-09-20
attorney did not provide him with discovery under WIS. STAT. § 971.23. The record belies this claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6644 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues with arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187922 - 2017-09-21
reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues with arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187922 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. § 974.06 (2015-16) 1 motion after a hearing. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216444 - 2018-08-01
. § 974.06 (2015-16) 1 motion after a hearing. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216444 - 2018-08-01
CA Blank Order
of the resentencing record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93564 - 2013-03-05
of the resentencing record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93564 - 2013-03-05
State v. Lee Anton Jackson
). “A discretionary determination must be the product of a rational mental process by which the facts of record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10749 - 2005-03-31
). “A discretionary determination must be the product of a rational mental process by which the facts of record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10749 - 2005-03-31
David L. Holland v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
affirmed the ALJ, noting that several inconsistencies in the medical record left it with a legitimate doubt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11253 - 2005-03-31
affirmed the ALJ, noting that several inconsistencies in the medical record left it with a legitimate doubt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11253 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
) “is literally a new hearing, not merely a review of whatever record may have been made before the ... court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52539 - 2010-07-26
) “is literally a new hearing, not merely a review of whatever record may have been made before the ... court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52539 - 2010-07-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
reviewing the record, counsel’s reports, and Jensen’s response, we conclude that there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246644 - 2019-09-18
reviewing the record, counsel’s reports, and Jensen’s response, we conclude that there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246644 - 2019-09-18