Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23991 - 24000 of 63981 for records/1000.
Search results 23991 - 24000 of 63981 for records/1000.
CA Blank Order
of his 1996 conviction is appropriate. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100891 - 2013-08-19
of his 1996 conviction is appropriate. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100891 - 2013-08-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and has not responded. Upon independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=198080 - 2017-10-24
and has not responded. Upon independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=198080 - 2017-10-24
CA Blank Order
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that this appeal may be disposed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93370 - 2013-02-26
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that this appeal may be disposed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93370 - 2013-02-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=380420 - 2021-06-24
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=380420 - 2021-06-24
CA Blank Order
of the resentencing record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93564 - 2013-03-05
of the resentencing record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93564 - 2013-03-05
CA Blank Order
given by the victim to police. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114318 - 2014-06-09
given by the victim to police. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114318 - 2014-06-09
Barry L. Ball v. Matthew Frank
OF REVIEW ΒΆ5 Our certiorari review is limited to the record created before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21513 - 2006-02-22
OF REVIEW ΒΆ5 Our certiorari review is limited to the record created before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21513 - 2006-02-22
CA Blank Order
report and conducting an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no arguably
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99709 - 2013-07-17
report and conducting an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no arguably
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99709 - 2013-07-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
-CRNM 2 response. Based upon our review of the no-merit report and the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252498 - 2020-01-13
-CRNM 2 response. Based upon our review of the no-merit report and the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252498 - 2020-01-13
Yusef L. Williams v. Matthew J. Frank
committee.[1] Williams contends that the security director did not indicate in the record why he prosecuted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6591 - 2005-03-31
committee.[1] Williams contends that the security director did not indicate in the record why he prosecuted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6591 - 2005-03-31