Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23991 - 24000 of 63986 for records/1000.
Search results 23991 - 24000 of 63986 for records/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record, as mandated by Anders, we conclude that there are no arguably meritorious issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263730 - 2020-06-09
review of the record, as mandated by Anders, we conclude that there are no arguably meritorious issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263730 - 2020-06-09
[PDF]
State v. Roger A. McGinnis
to obtain executive clemency. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9887 - 2017-09-19
to obtain executive clemency. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9887 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), this court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=780038 - 2024-03-26
an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), this court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=780038 - 2024-03-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the Record, we conclude that the order 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=770136 - 2024-02-28
review of the Record, we conclude that the order 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=770136 - 2024-02-28
COURT OF APPEALS
, 270 Wis. 2d 535, 678 N.W.2d 197. The record must show that the court’s discretionary decision had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33222 - 2008-07-01
, 270 Wis. 2d 535, 678 N.W.2d 197. The record must show that the court’s discretionary decision had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33222 - 2008-07-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Nos. 2016AP1841-CRNM 2016AP1842-CRNM 2 record, we conclude there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181706 - 2017-09-21
. Nos. 2016AP1841-CRNM 2016AP1842-CRNM 2 record, we conclude there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181706 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
reviewing the record, counsel’s reports, and Jensen’s response, we conclude that there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246644 - 2019-09-18
reviewing the record, counsel’s reports, and Jensen’s response, we conclude that there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246644 - 2019-09-18
[PDF]
State v. Barbara J. Anderson
of its discretion in denying modification. The record reveals that when it imposed sentence on June 8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4336 - 2017-09-19
of its discretion in denying modification. The record reveals that when it imposed sentence on June 8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4336 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
filed a response. After reviewing the record, counsel’s report, and Gascoigne’s response, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=775987 - 2024-03-20
filed a response. After reviewing the record, counsel’s report, and Gascoigne’s response, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=775987 - 2024-03-20
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=983376 - 2025-07-16
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=983376 - 2025-07-16