Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 241 - 250 of 69092 for he.
Search results 241 - 250 of 69092 for he.
State v. William R. Severson
.[1] William R. Severson appeals from a judgment convicting him of operating while intoxicated. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6029 - 2005-03-31
.[1] William R. Severson appeals from a judgment convicting him of operating while intoxicated. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6029 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
plea prior to sentencing. We affirm. Before he was sentenced, Eickner obtained successor counsel who
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=417443 - 2021-09-01
plea prior to sentencing. We affirm. Before he was sentenced, Eickner obtained successor counsel who
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=417443 - 2021-09-01
State v. Jesse L. Jollie
. § 940.19(1) (1999-2000).[2] He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. Jollie
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4337 - 2005-03-31
. § 940.19(1) (1999-2000).[2] He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. Jollie
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4337 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jesse L. Jollie
of battery, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 940.19(1) (1999-2000). 2 He also appeals from an order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4337 - 2017-09-19
of battery, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 940.19(1) (1999-2000). 2 He also appeals from an order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4337 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. William R. Severson
intoxicated. He pled no contest to the charge after the trial court denied his motion to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6029 - 2017-09-19
intoxicated. He pled no contest to the charge after the trial court denied his motion to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6029 - 2017-09-19
State v. William Remington
WEDEMEYER, P.J.[1] William Remington appeals from a judgment entered after he pled no contest to operating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15715 - 2005-03-31
WEDEMEYER, P.J.[1] William Remington appeals from a judgment entered after he pled no contest to operating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15715 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. William Remington
a judgment entered after he pled no contest to operating a motor vehicle while under the influence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15715 - 2017-09-21
a judgment entered after he pled no contest to operating a motor vehicle while under the influence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15715 - 2017-09-21
State v. Henry E. Stothard
, contrary to § 346.57(4)(h), Stats., 1993‑94. The single issue he presents on appeal is whether the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11178 - 2005-03-31
, contrary to § 346.57(4)(h), Stats., 1993‑94. The single issue he presents on appeal is whether the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11178 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Henry E. Stothard
., 1993-94. The single issue he presents on appeal is whether the State proved by clear and convincing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11178 - 2017-09-19
., 1993-94. The single issue he presents on appeal is whether the State proved by clear and convincing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11178 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in possession of a firearm, contrary to WIS. STAT. §§ 940.02(1), 939.05, and 941.29(2) (2013-14). 1 He also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213013 - 2018-05-22
in possession of a firearm, contrary to WIS. STAT. §§ 940.02(1), 939.05, and 941.29(2) (2013-14). 1 He also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213013 - 2018-05-22