Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 241 - 250 of 59268 for quit claim deed.
Search results 241 - 250 of 59268 for quit claim deed.
George Dufield v. Tom McCormick
claims he established exclusive ownership of the access by adverse possession. Because the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7478 - 2005-03-31
claims he established exclusive ownership of the access by adverse possession. Because the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7478 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Larry A. Wynhoff v. Gary S. Vogt
the intent of the grantor. There, Mills claimed that when he deeded No. 99-0103 10 property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14994 - 2017-09-21
the intent of the grantor. There, Mills claimed that when he deeded No. 99-0103 10 property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14994 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the Bank via the sheriff’s deed.5 Consequently, Pilecky claims that McCarty retained the authority
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=362613 - 2021-05-04
to the Bank via the sheriff’s deed.5 Consequently, Pilecky claims that McCarty retained the authority
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=362613 - 2021-05-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the Trust obtaining the easement, the easement was granted to Berg under a deed when Berg purchased his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192742 - 2017-09-21
to the Trust obtaining the easement, the easement was granted to Berg under a deed when Berg purchased his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192742 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
to reform a deed executed by previous owners of the properties now owned by the parties. Waarvick argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36615 - 2009-05-27
to reform a deed executed by previous owners of the properties now owned by the parties. Waarvick argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36615 - 2009-05-27
[PDF]
NOTICE
241. Here, the Solises claim a mutual mistake between Sackett and Johnson in the 1967 deed creating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36615 - 2014-09-15
241. Here, the Solises claim a mutual mistake between Sackett and Johnson in the 1967 deed creating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36615 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of closing, Mednikow also drafted a quit-claim deed, real estate transfer return, corporate consent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89671 - 2014-09-15
of closing, Mednikow also drafted a quit-claim deed, real estate transfer return, corporate consent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89671 - 2014-09-15
Steven J. Wickenhauser v. Jack Lehtinen
owned one-half of the property and asked the Wickenhausers to sign a quit claim deed conveying him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20888 - 2006-01-09
owned one-half of the property and asked the Wickenhausers to sign a quit claim deed conveying him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20888 - 2006-01-09
[PDF]
Steven J. Wickenhauser v. Jack Lehtinen
a quit claim deed conveying him that interest. The Wickenhausers refused. On March 28, 2001, Lehtinen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20888 - 2017-09-21
a quit claim deed conveying him that interest. The Wickenhausers refused. On March 28, 2001, Lehtinen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20888 - 2017-09-21
Lawson Bender v. Karmen Lindhal
by Lindhal and invalidated the quitclaim deed, there was no reason to address any of Lindhal's other claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8396 - 2005-03-31
by Lindhal and invalidated the quitclaim deed, there was no reason to address any of Lindhal's other claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8396 - 2005-03-31