Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2401 - 2410 of 64107 for educator arrested 13th bail hearing "2013-2023".
Search results 2401 - 2410 of 64107 for educator arrested 13th bail hearing "2013-2023".
State v. David W. Pender
latest conviction for bail jumping, having pleaded no contest to the charge and having received a ninety
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11500 - 2005-03-31
latest conviction for bail jumping, having pleaded no contest to the charge and having received a ninety
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11500 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for the misdemeanor counts. The parties stipulated at a later hearing that Murphy had violated the hold-open
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=232038 - 2019-01-09
for the misdemeanor counts. The parties stipulated at a later hearing that Murphy had violated the hold-open
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=232038 - 2019-01-09
[PDF]
Frontsheet
in violation of Wis. Stat. § 961.41(3g)(b) and bail jumping in violation of Wis. Stat. § 946.49(1)(a), both
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=229854 - 2018-12-14
in violation of Wis. Stat. § 961.41(3g)(b) and bail jumping in violation of Wis. Stat. § 946.49(1)(a), both
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=229854 - 2018-12-14
State v. Luis Cardenas-Hernandez
, 1991, during a separate bail hearing, ADA Smith stated to the court that "when the Metro unit executed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17195 - 2005-03-31
, 1991, during a separate bail hearing, ADA Smith stated to the court that "when the Metro unit executed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17195 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Luis Cardenas-Hernandez
, 1991, during a separate bail hearing, ADA Smith stated to the court that "when the Metro unit
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17195 - 2017-09-21
, 1991, during a separate bail hearing, ADA Smith stated to the court that "when the Metro unit
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17195 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
that the trial court[2] erroneously exercised its discretion when it denied him an evidentiary hearing to explore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36990 - 2009-07-06
that the trial court[2] erroneously exercised its discretion when it denied him an evidentiary hearing to explore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36990 - 2009-07-06
[PDF]
NOTICE
court2 erroneously exercised its discretion when it denied him an evidentiary hearing to explore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36990 - 2014-09-15
court2 erroneously exercised its discretion when it denied him an evidentiary hearing to explore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36990 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Response to Letter Briefs (Lisa Hunter et al.)
I certify that on this 13th day of October 2021, I caused a copy of this brief to be served upon
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/resltrbriefshunter.pdf - 2021-10-18
I certify that on this 13th day of October 2021, I caused a copy of this brief to be served upon
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/resltrbriefshunter.pdf - 2021-10-18
State v. Robert T. Langston
with the State in which he waived his right to a preliminary hearing in return for the State’s promise to charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11319 - 2005-03-31
with the State in which he waived his right to a preliminary hearing in return for the State’s promise to charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11319 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert T. Langston
with the State in which he waived his right to a preliminary hearing in return for the State’s promise to charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11318 - 2005-03-31
with the State in which he waived his right to a preliminary hearing in return for the State’s promise to charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11318 - 2005-03-31