Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2401 - 2410 of 9126 for op.
Search results 2401 - 2410 of 9126 for op.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the divorce judgment. See Tautges v. Weigel, No. 2008AP1959-FT, unpublished slip op. (WI App Feb. 17
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88769 - 2014-09-15
the divorce judgment. See Tautges v. Weigel, No. 2008AP1959-FT, unpublished slip op. (WI App Feb. 17
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88769 - 2014-09-15
State v. Michael M. Longcore
. Op. Att’y Gen., supra, at 138. Longcore violated the statute. Therefore, the officer had probable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2553 - 2005-03-31
. Op. Att’y Gen., supra, at 138. Longcore violated the statute. Therefore, the officer had probable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2553 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Jerry Saenz v. Gary McCaughtry
-2972, slip op. at 8 (Wis. Ct. App. Aug. 6, 1998), we stated that the appropriate standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13416 - 2017-09-21
-2972, slip op. at 8 (Wis. Ct. App. Aug. 6, 1998), we stated that the appropriate standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13416 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
here. See State v. Scolman, No. 2007AP2682-CR, unpublished slip op. ¶¶2–4 (WI App Oct. 2, 2008
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74805 - 2011-12-21
here. See State v. Scolman, No. 2007AP2682-CR, unpublished slip op. ¶¶2–4 (WI App Oct. 2, 2008
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74805 - 2011-12-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
evidence. This court summarily affirmed. See State v. Burns, No. 2002AP1045-CR, unpublished slip op
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66208 - 2014-09-15
evidence. This court summarily affirmed. See State v. Burns, No. 2002AP1045-CR, unpublished slip op
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66208 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, No. 2003AP3212, unpublished slip op. ¶32 (WI App Nov. 23, 2004). Thus, the “recantation,” to the extent Evans
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81586 - 2014-09-15
, No. 2003AP3212, unpublished slip op. ¶32 (WI App Nov. 23, 2004). Thus, the “recantation,” to the extent Evans
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81586 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Louis M. Elizondo, Jr.
. In State v. Elizondo, No. 95-3595, unpublished slip op. (Wis. Ct. App. July 18, 1996), we held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12623 - 2017-09-21
. In State v. Elizondo, No. 95-3595, unpublished slip op. (Wis. Ct. App. July 18, 1996), we held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12623 - 2017-09-21
State v. Anthony Murray
] Id., slip op. at 6. The motion must raise an issue of fact regarding whether trial counsel's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9682 - 2005-03-31
] Id., slip op. at 6. The motion must raise an issue of fact regarding whether trial counsel's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9682 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and Knaus since 2008. See Town of Ledgeview v. Knaus, No. 2011AP979, unpublished slip op., ¶¶2-9 (WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207144 - 2018-01-17
and Knaus since 2008. See Town of Ledgeview v. Knaus, No. 2011AP979, unpublished slip op., ¶¶2-9 (WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207144 - 2018-01-17
State v. Confucius Gooden
information: 1. That the victim disagreed with the plea bargain. Majority op. at 2. 2. That the prosecutor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11869 - 2005-03-31
information: 1. That the victim disagreed with the plea bargain. Majority op. at 2. 2. That the prosecutor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11869 - 2005-03-31