Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24001 - 24010 of 30072 for de.
Search results 24001 - 24010 of 30072 for de.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
¶14 We review de novo the circuit court’s decision to deny James’ petition for discharge filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699307 - 2023-09-06
¶14 We review de novo the circuit court’s decision to deny James’ petition for discharge filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699307 - 2023-09-06
[PDF]
WI APP 75
review de novo. See Estate of Sustache v. American Family Mut. Ins. Co., 2008 WI 87, ¶18, 311 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83437 - 2014-09-15
review de novo. See Estate of Sustache v. American Family Mut. Ins. Co., 2008 WI 87, ¶18, 311 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83437 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
or deny summary judgment de novo. Hardy v. Hoefferle, 2007 WI App 264, ¶6, 306 Wis. 2d 513, 743 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=198063 - 2017-10-19
or deny summary judgment de novo. Hardy v. Hoefferle, 2007 WI App 264, ¶6, 306 Wis. 2d 513, 743 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=198063 - 2017-10-19
[PDF]
State v. Daniel W. Nipple
to the defendant is a question of law that we review de novo. See id. at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715. To prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14109 - 2014-09-15
to the defendant is a question of law that we review de novo. See id. at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715. To prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14109 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review the grant or denial of summary judgment de novo, and we apply the same standard as does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193169 - 2017-09-21
review the grant or denial of summary judgment de novo, and we apply the same standard as does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193169 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
requirements presents a question of law we review de novo. Id. ¶18 Pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 51.20(1)(a)2.c
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=317998 - 2020-12-23
requirements presents a question of law we review de novo. Id. ¶18 Pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 51.20(1)(a)2.c
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=317998 - 2020-12-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. 2d 217, 738 N.W.2d 114 (citation omitted). We review de novo the trial court’s determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242977 - 2019-07-02
. 2d 217, 738 N.W.2d 114 (citation omitted). We review de novo the trial court’s determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242977 - 2019-07-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the evidence satisfies the legal standard for protective placement is a question of law that we review de
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=551878 - 2022-08-04
the evidence satisfies the legal standard for protective placement is a question of law that we review de
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=551878 - 2022-08-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 248 Wis. 2d 297, 635 N.W.2d 797. ¶17 We review de novo the decision of the municipality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=928523 - 2025-03-18
, 248 Wis. 2d 297, 635 N.W.2d 797. ¶17 We review de novo the decision of the municipality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=928523 - 2025-03-18
2011 WI App 59
review de novo the grant or denial of summary judgment, employing the same methodology as the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62340 - 2011-06-12
review de novo the grant or denial of summary judgment, employing the same methodology as the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62340 - 2011-06-12