Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24001 - 24010 of 57201 for id.
Search results 24001 - 24010 of 57201 for id.
State v. Diane K. Butz
probable cause. Id. at 36. Second, the trial court need not believe the officer’s account of the events
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4108 - 2005-03-31
probable cause. Id. at 36. Second, the trial court need not believe the officer’s account of the events
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4108 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael Bremer
barrier placed in the path of an officer gives rise to a violation of that statute. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10582 - 2005-03-31
barrier placed in the path of an officer gives rise to a violation of that statute. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10582 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
will not disturb its maintenance decision unless the award represents an erroneous exercise of discretion. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57120 - 2014-09-15
will not disturb its maintenance decision unless the award represents an erroneous exercise of discretion. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57120 - 2014-09-15
State v. Joseph H. Harrington
in the presentation of evidence at trial. See id. at 267, 531 N.W.2d at 354. We recognize that the portion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12652 - 2005-03-31
in the presentation of evidence at trial. See id. at 267, 531 N.W.2d at 354. We recognize that the portion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12652 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Scott T. Baskin
they are clearly erroneous. Second, we review the determination of reasonable suspicion independently. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4131 - 2017-09-20
they are clearly erroneous. Second, we review the determination of reasonable suspicion independently. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4131 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Ardie Byrd
to correct a “manifest injustice.” Id. at 378-79, 534 N.W.2d at 626. A “manifest injustice” is “a serious
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11212 - 2017-09-19
to correct a “manifest injustice.” Id. at 378-79, 534 N.W.2d at 626. A “manifest injustice” is “a serious
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11212 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
evidence of its unreliability,” corroborating evidence is necessary. Id. (citation omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28686 - 2014-09-15
evidence of its unreliability,” corroborating evidence is necessary. Id. (citation omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28686 - 2014-09-15
State v. Jose Luis Martinez
delivery to a third party. Id. at 52-53, 571 N.W.2d at 180. However, it is enough if the agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14743 - 2005-03-31
delivery to a third party. Id. at 52-53, 571 N.W.2d at 180. However, it is enough if the agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14743 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Id., ¶23. “Frivolous actions hinder a court’s ability to function efficiently and effectively
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1011166 - 2025-09-16
. Id., ¶23. “Frivolous actions hinder a court’s ability to function efficiently and effectively
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1011166 - 2025-09-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the discretion of the court. Id. “A defendant has a constitutionally protected due process right
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206748 - 2018-01-10
the discretion of the court. Id. “A defendant has a constitutionally protected due process right
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206748 - 2018-01-10