Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24011 - 24020 of 30059 for de.
Search results 24011 - 24020 of 30059 for de.
[PDF]
SCR CHAPTER 21
whether to investigate and to prosecute de minimis violations. Discretion permits the office
/sc/scrule/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1032720 - 2025-10-30
whether to investigate and to prosecute de minimis violations. Discretion permits the office
/sc/scrule/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1032720 - 2025-10-30
2008 WI APP 2
de novo. See Weston v. DWD, 2007 WI App 167, ¶12, __ Wis. 2d __, 737 N.W.2d 74. However, we may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31093 - 2008-01-29
de novo. See Weston v. DWD, 2007 WI App 167, ¶12, __ Wis. 2d __, 737 N.W.2d 74. However, we may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31093 - 2008-01-29
State v. Wallace I. Stenzel
of initial confinement is a de facto life sentence. Stenzel asserts: Age of the defendant is critical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7023 - 2005-03-31
of initial confinement is a de facto life sentence. Stenzel asserts: Age of the defendant is critical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7023 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
“acted according to law.” ¶8 Because our review of the Common Council’s decision is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70007 - 2014-09-15
“acted according to law.” ¶8 Because our review of the Common Council’s decision is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70007 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Donavan D. Theno
is a question of law which we review de novo without deference to the trial court’s conclusion. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16027 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law which we review de novo without deference to the trial court’s conclusion. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16027 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Al-Furqaan Fussilat v. Gary R. Mccaughtry
, the court does not conduct a de novo review. Van Ermen, 84 Wis.2d at 64, 267 N.W.2d at 20. The court does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8616 - 2017-09-19
, the court does not conduct a de novo review. Van Ermen, 84 Wis.2d at 64, 267 N.W.2d at 20. The court does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8616 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Town of Windsor v. Village of DeForest
is a question of law that we review de novo. Freedom from Religion Found., Inc. v. Thompson, 164 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4898 - 2017-09-19
is a question of law that we review de novo. Freedom from Religion Found., Inc. v. Thompson, 164 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4898 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
knowledge. See De Keuster v. Green Bay & W. R.R. Co., 264 Wis. 476, 479, 59 N.W.2d 452 (1953). The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106756 - 2017-09-21
knowledge. See De Keuster v. Green Bay & W. R.R. Co., 264 Wis. 476, 479, 59 N.W.2d 452 (1953). The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106756 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Frontsheet
of fact are affirmed unless clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=202686 - 2017-11-17
of fact are affirmed unless clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=202686 - 2017-11-17
[PDF]
Warren L. Blakslee v. General Motors Corporation
) (citation omitted). Our review of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. See Green Spring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14800 - 2017-09-21
) (citation omitted). Our review of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. See Green Spring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14800 - 2017-09-21