Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24021 - 24030 of 84377 for case number.
Search results 24021 - 24030 of 84377 for case number.
State v. Anthony Mark Caravella
no other way we can talk about it honestly. As to your character, I see a number of things. I see a very
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24944 - 2006-05-01
no other way we can talk about it honestly. As to your character, I see a number of things. I see a very
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24944 - 2006-05-01
State v. Donald Mitchell
to the prosecution’s intent to use evidence that a number of homes in the vicinity of the victim’s home had cable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14342 - 2005-03-31
to the prosecution’s intent to use evidence that a number of homes in the vicinity of the victim’s home had cable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14342 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ronald H. Gilpin
of the particular case, Hubanks, 173 Wis.2d at 25, 496 N.W.2d at 105; and to prevail in the argument the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14262 - 2005-03-31
of the particular case, Hubanks, 173 Wis.2d at 25, 496 N.W.2d at 105; and to prevail in the argument the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14262 - 2005-03-31
Town of Campbell v. City of La Crosse
2001 WI App 201 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case Nos.: 00-1913 00-1914 00
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2816 - 2005-03-31
2001 WI App 201 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case Nos.: 00-1913 00-1914 00
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2816 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, but which was filed under a separate case number, Marquette County Case No. 2008TR2826. [4] As we noted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83738 - 2012-06-20
, but which was filed under a separate case number, Marquette County Case No. 2008TR2826. [4] As we noted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83738 - 2012-06-20
[PDF]
WI APP 51
2013 WI APP 51 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2012AP758-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94530 - 2014-09-15
2013 WI APP 51 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2012AP758-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94530 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 42
2011 WI APP 42 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2010AP1219
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60297 - 2014-09-15
2011 WI APP 42 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2010AP1219
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60297 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Nicole R. Walton v. The Home Indemnity Corporation
the moving party has made a prima facie case for summary judgment under sec. 802.08(2).” Grams v. Boss, 97
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9177 - 2017-09-19
the moving party has made a prima facie case for summary judgment under sec. 802.08(2).” Grams v. Boss, 97
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9177 - 2017-09-19
State v. Andrew Newson
testified that he was not the person who sold drugs to Tarver. ¶3 The case was first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18855 - 2005-07-05
testified that he was not the person who sold drugs to Tarver. ¶3 The case was first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18855 - 2005-07-05
[PDF]
Diane Antczak v. River Hills South Investors
the same underlying events, they are significantly different. She maintains that “the first case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12682 - 2017-09-21
the same underlying events, they are significantly different. She maintains that “the first case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12682 - 2017-09-21