Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24021 - 24030 of 57878 for id.
Search results 24021 - 24030 of 57878 for id.
Mary L. Brice v. Roger Garfield Dale Miller, Sr.
. See id. at 66, 306 N.W.2d at 20-21. It is well-established that a trial court, in the exercise of its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14587 - 2005-03-31
. See id. at 66, 306 N.W.2d at 20-21. It is well-established that a trial court, in the exercise of its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14587 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 81
a specified period. Id. at 50-51. The supreme court concluded that the statutory language evinced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50273 - 2014-09-15
a specified period. Id. at 50-51. The supreme court concluded that the statutory language evinced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50273 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
, deliberate, and unequivocal.” See id. at 174. In other words, a judicial admission is something an attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75243 - 2011-12-14
, deliberate, and unequivocal.” See id. at 174. In other words, a judicial admission is something an attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75243 - 2011-12-14
COURT OF APPEALS
was not deficient because the testimony was relevant. Id., ¶¶14, 16. The third alleged error was counsel’s failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35557 - 2009-02-17
was not deficient because the testimony was relevant. Id., ¶¶14, 16. The third alleged error was counsel’s failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35557 - 2009-02-17
Robert Vines, Jr. v. Ken Sondalle
versus ministerial analysis.” Id. at 21-22, 546 N.W.2d at 160. This is not the rare case. Vines argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12947 - 2005-03-31
versus ministerial analysis.” Id. at 21-22, 546 N.W.2d at 160. This is not the rare case. Vines argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12947 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
’ guaranteed the defendant by the Sixth Amendment.” Id. A defendant must establish that counsel’s conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30812 - 2007-11-13
’ guaranteed the defendant by the Sixth Amendment.” Id. A defendant must establish that counsel’s conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30812 - 2007-11-13
[PDF]
State v. Edward L. Snider
decision. Id. If a court exercises discretion based on an erroneous legal standard, its conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4673 - 2017-09-19
decision. Id. If a court exercises discretion based on an erroneous legal standard, its conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4673 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Andres Godina
and with the requirement that the defendant must show some unreasonable basis for the sentence. See id. at 565, 431 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13093 - 2017-09-21
and with the requirement that the defendant must show some unreasonable basis for the sentence. See id. at 565, 431 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13093 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jason M. Mulroy
exercise of discretion. See id. There is a strong public policy against interfering with the sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6757 - 2005-03-31
exercise of discretion. See id. There is a strong public policy against interfering with the sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6757 - 2005-03-31
State v. Charles E. Phinisee
the identity of the perpetrator.” Id. at 560, 273 N.W.2d at 313. We reject that reading of Francis, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12066 - 2005-03-31
the identity of the perpetrator.” Id. at 560, 273 N.W.2d at 313. We reject that reading of Francis, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12066 - 2005-03-31