Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24021 - 24030 of 46127 for paternity test paper work.

State v. Lawrence M. Ventrice
are to be restrictively applied.” The State then asserts that Ventrice is required to satisfy the five-part test set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4042 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
testing the substance found in Davis’s pocket. She told the jury the substance contained
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207803 - 2018-01-26

2009 WI APP 161
N.W.2d 578 (No. 2007AP845-CR): [M]ultiplicity claims are examined under a two-part test. The first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41725 - 2009-11-23

[PDF] Robert Voss v. Waushara County Board of Adjustment
Board of Adjustment, 218 Wis. 2d 396, 577 N.W.2d 813 (1998), and employ the less-strict test for area
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5260 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] James Bruno v. Milwaukee County
, the ordinance should generally be considered ambiguous." Concurrence, ¶32. ¶18 This distorts the test
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16531 - 2017-09-21

Management Computer Services, Inc. v. Hawkins
an alternative. But that is not the test appellate courts use when faced with an argument that a jury question
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7687 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Victoria Jocius v. Mark Jocius
-part test. See id. at 699, 533 N.W.2d at 437. In a lengthy opinion, the supreme court noted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11475 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
of an improper legal standard.” Id., ¶14. The Howell test does not apply in instances of physical occupation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142484 - 2015-05-26

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
). If the defendant fails to adequately show one prong of the Strickland test, we need not address the second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83737 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
to satisfy the “no negligence” prong of the newly discovered evidence test, the trial court considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36404 - 2014-09-15