Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24031 - 24040 of 65137 for or b.
Search results 24031 - 24040 of 65137 for or b.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
activated his lights “[b]ased on the procedures we use whenever we’re making contact with somebody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=395419 - 2021-07-22
activated his lights “[b]ased on the procedures we use whenever we’re making contact with somebody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=395419 - 2021-07-22
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
-08: In the matter of petition to amend Supreme Court Rule 10.03(5)(b)1. The question before
/sc/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87194 - 2014-09-15
-08: In the matter of petition to amend Supreme Court Rule 10.03(5)(b)1. The question before
/sc/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87194 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN
, the Honorable Gerald P. Ptacek, and by Attorney Jacquelynn B. Rothstein, Chair of the Subcommittee
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251621 - 2019-12-18
, the Honorable Gerald P. Ptacek, and by Attorney Jacquelynn B. Rothstein, Chair of the Subcommittee
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251621 - 2019-12-18
Melissa Newkirk v. Wisconsin Department of Transportation
] and (b) must be in a form rendering the signer “punishable for perjury” should the statement be untrue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14640 - 2005-03-31
] and (b) must be in a form rendering the signer “punishable for perjury” should the statement be untrue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14640 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
.—Order affirmed. This opinion shall not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36009 - 2009-03-30
.—Order affirmed. This opinion shall not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36009 - 2009-03-30
State v. Derek A. Hinton
prongs of the test, the trial court properly denied his motion for a new trial. B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11583 - 2005-03-31
prongs of the test, the trial court properly denied his motion for a new trial. B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11583 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Racine County: Allan b. torhorst, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35552 - 2009-02-17
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Racine County: Allan b. torhorst, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35552 - 2009-02-17
County of Rock v. Robert D. Haylock
ordinance adopting § 346.63(1)(b). He seeks review of an order denying his motions to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9294 - 2005-03-31
ordinance adopting § 346.63(1)(b). He seeks review of an order denying his motions to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9294 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kenyatta Thigpen
to the jury or summarize Butler’s testimony regarding his purpose for going to the residence.[2] B. Admission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16038 - 2005-03-31
to the jury or summarize Butler’s testimony regarding his purpose for going to the residence.[2] B. Admission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16038 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael R. Caspersen
will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)4. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4920 - 2005-03-31
will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)4. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4920 - 2005-03-31