Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24051 - 24060 of 29823 for des.
Search results 24051 - 24060 of 29823 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
that, if true, would entitle the defendant to relief. Id. This is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93205 - 2013-02-26
that, if true, would entitle the defendant to relief. Id. This is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93205 - 2013-02-26
COURT OF APPEALS
of an order granting a motion to dismiss a complaint is de novo. State ex rel. Lawton v. Town of Barton, 2005
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29320 - 2007-06-12
of an order granting a motion to dismiss a complaint is de novo. State ex rel. Lawton v. Town of Barton, 2005
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29320 - 2007-06-12
Charles Johnson v. Rogers Memorial Hospital, Inc.
& Shipping, 202 Wis. 2d 138, 142, 549 N.W.2d 714, 715 (1996). We review questions of law de novo. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13636 - 2005-03-31
& Shipping, 202 Wis. 2d 138, 142, 549 N.W.2d 714, 715 (1996). We review questions of law de novo. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13636 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that this court reviews de novo. State v. Haase, 2006 WI App 86, ¶5, 293 Wis. 2d 322, 716 N.W.2d 526. R.A
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=731816 - 2023-11-22
that this court reviews de novo. State v. Haase, 2006 WI App 86, ¶5, 293 Wis. 2d 322, 716 N.W.2d 526. R.A
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=731816 - 2023-11-22
[PDF]
Frontsheet
erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Eisenberg
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=312507 - 2020-12-09
erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Eisenberg
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=312507 - 2020-12-09
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Armstrong, 223 Wis. 2d 331, 345, 352-353, 588 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30948 - 2007-11-20
is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Armstrong, 223 Wis. 2d 331, 345, 352-353, 588 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30948 - 2007-11-20
Advantage Leasing Corporation v. Novatech Solutions, Inc.
summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same method employed by the circuit court. Brownelli v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17885 - 2005-05-02
summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same method employed by the circuit court. Brownelli v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17885 - 2005-05-02
State v. Benjamin J. Barney
or after “sentencing.” This is a question of law which we decide de novo. Ball v. District No. 4 Area Bd
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11682 - 2005-03-31
or after “sentencing.” This is a question of law which we decide de novo. Ball v. District No. 4 Area Bd
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11682 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
“acted according to law.” ¶8 Because our review of the Common Council’s decision is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70007 - 2011-08-17
“acted according to law.” ¶8 Because our review of the Common Council’s decision is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70007 - 2011-08-17
Warren L. Blakslee v. General Motors Corporation
278 (Ct. App. 1994) (citation omitted). Our review of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14800 - 2005-03-31
278 (Ct. App. 1994) (citation omitted). Our review of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14800 - 2005-03-31