Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24061 - 24070 of 29823 for des.
Search results 24061 - 24070 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
Kathleen M. Taylor v. Marshall & Ilsley Trust Company
of the trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo, and we apply the same standards as did the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4440 - 2017-09-19
of the trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo, and we apply the same standards as did the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4440 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 849 N.W.2d 693. We review de novo the circuit court’s determination that the neighbors’ complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1026784 - 2025-10-23
, 849 N.W.2d 693. We review de novo the circuit court’s determination that the neighbors’ complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1026784 - 2025-10-23
Paul Closser v. Town of Harding
of law that we review de novo. Barth v. Board of Educ., 108 Wis.2d 511, 517, 322 N.W.2d 694, 697 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11619 - 2005-03-31
of law that we review de novo. Barth v. Board of Educ., 108 Wis.2d 511, 517, 322 N.W.2d 694, 697 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11619 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Brian E. Davis v. Nationsbank, N.A.
granting summary judgment. See id. Our review is de novo. See id. ¶31 Davis alleges that Nationsbank
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2388 - 2017-09-19
granting summary judgment. See id. Our review is de novo. See id. ¶31 Davis alleges that Nationsbank
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2388 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Elizabeth P. v. Mark R.F.
issues of material fact under sec. 805.17(2), 3 Stats., and reviewing the legal issues de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12008 - 2017-09-21
issues of material fact under sec. 805.17(2), 3 Stats., and reviewing the legal issues de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12008 - 2017-09-21
State v. Daniel W. Nipple
it was prejudicial to the defendant is a question of law that we review de novo. See id. at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14109 - 2005-03-31
it was prejudicial to the defendant is a question of law that we review de novo. See id. at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14109 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
§ 971.12(1) presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Locke, 177 Wis. 2d 590
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109465 - 2017-09-21
§ 971.12(1) presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Locke, 177 Wis. 2d 590
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109465 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
are questions of law, which we review de novo, although we “bear[] in mind the deferential standard we apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110424 - 2014-04-16
are questions of law, which we review de novo, although we “bear[] in mind the deferential standard we apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110424 - 2014-04-16
[PDF]
State v. Steven R. Horton
de novo. See Winiarski v. Miicke, 186 Wis.2d 409, 412, 521 N.W.2d 162, 164 (Ct. App. 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7742 - 2017-09-19
de novo. See Winiarski v. Miicke, 186 Wis.2d 409, 412, 521 N.W.2d 162, 164 (Ct. App. 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7742 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
] review de novo. If the motion raises such facts, the circuit court must hold an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63726 - 2014-09-15
] review de novo. If the motion raises such facts, the circuit court must hold an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63726 - 2014-09-15