Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24061 - 24070 of 29823 for des.

[PDF] NOTICE
is a question of law, which we review de novo. Guertin v. Harbour Assur. Co., 141 Wis. 2d 622, 627-28, 415
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34914 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Amy Remiszewski v. American Family Insurance Company
policies. ¶11 Insurance contract interpretation presents a question of law that is reviewed de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6939 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Lisa A. Carter
only a single $20 fee. This presents a question of statutory interpretation that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14142 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Titus Graham
to be reviewed de novo. Id. If the motion fails to allege sufficient facts, then the trial court has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24635 - 2017-09-21

2010 WI APP 42
declarations pass constitutional muster is a matter of law that we assess de novo. See State v. Jensen, 2007
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46522 - 2011-01-03

[PDF] State v. Roger P. Barber
is a question of law which we review de novo under the admitted state of the facts. See State v. Ziegenhagen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11894 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI APP 2
interpretation is generally a question of law that we review de novo. See Weston v. DWD, 2007 WI App 167, ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31093 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Michael J. Forster
, such as the meaning of “intimate parts” within WIS. STAT. ch. 939, are questions of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5005 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Wisconsin Coalition for Voter Participation, Inc. v. State of Wisconsin Elections Board
and administrative rules.4 ¶11 We, of course, review the circuit court’s decision de novo, as it involves
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16051 - 2017-09-21

2009 WI App 183
to our de novo review. State v. Cole, 2000 WI App 52, ¶3, 233 Wis. 2d 577, 608 N.W.2d 432
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43539 - 2009-12-15