Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24071 - 24080 of 56385 for General Account Probate.
Search results 24071 - 24080 of 56385 for General Account Probate.
CA Blank Order
Register in Probate Ozaukee County Circuit Court 1201 South Spring Street Port Washington, WI 53074-0994
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99393 - 2013-07-16
Register in Probate Ozaukee County Circuit Court 1201 South Spring Street Port Washington, WI 53074-0994
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99393 - 2013-07-16
State v. Jason M. Sicard
’ probation, consecutive to the ten-year prison term. ¶3 In his postconviction motion, Sicard requested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4162 - 2005-03-31
’ probation, consecutive to the ten-year prison term. ¶3 In his postconviction motion, Sicard requested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4162 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
stayed a sentence of nine months’ jail and ordered Rugg to serve two years of probation, consecutive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=698963 - 2023-09-06
stayed a sentence of nine months’ jail and ordered Rugg to serve two years of probation, consecutive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=698963 - 2023-09-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
stayed a sentence of nine months’ jail and ordered Rugg to serve two years of probation, consecutive
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=698963 - 2023-09-06
stayed a sentence of nine months’ jail and ordered Rugg to serve two years of probation, consecutive
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=698963 - 2023-09-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
probation would not be appropriate as it would “totally depreciate the seriousness” of the offenses. When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172786 - 2017-09-21
probation would not be appropriate as it would “totally depreciate the seriousness” of the offenses. When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172786 - 2017-09-21
State v. Eddie L. Thomas
in prison and a sixteen-year prison term was imposed but stayed in favor of ten years’ probation. In March
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15353 - 2005-03-31
in prison and a sixteen-year prison term was imposed but stayed in favor of ten years’ probation. In March
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15353 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jason M. Sicard
, and Sicard was placed on five years’ probation, consecutive to the ten-year prison term. ¶3 In his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4162 - 2017-09-20
, and Sicard was placed on five years’ probation, consecutive to the ten-year prison term. ¶3 In his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4162 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
WI APP 218
; monthly payments of $425 over three years of probation would total $15,300). The Huml court also stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26563 - 2014-09-15
; monthly payments of $425 over three years of probation would total $15,300). The Huml court also stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26563 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Eddie L. Thomas
prison term was imposed but stayed in favor of ten years’ probation. In March 1998, Thomas filed a pro
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15352 - 2017-09-21
prison term was imposed but stayed in favor of ten years’ probation. In March 1998, Thomas filed a pro
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15352 - 2017-09-21
State v. Roy J. Jones
not investigate whether there was a violation-of-probation/parole warrant for Jones or an arrest warrant; (4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20700 - 2005-12-19
not investigate whether there was a violation-of-probation/parole warrant for Jones or an arrest warrant; (4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20700 - 2005-12-19