Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24071 - 24080 of 29713 for des.
Search results 24071 - 24080 of 29713 for des.
State v. Daniel W. Nipple
it was prejudicial to the defendant is a question of law that we review de novo. See id. at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14109 - 2005-03-31
it was prejudicial to the defendant is a question of law that we review de novo. See id. at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14109 - 2005-03-31
2006 WI APP 238
The interpretation of provisions of the administrative code presents a question of law which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26903 - 2006-11-20
The interpretation of provisions of the administrative code presents a question of law which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26903 - 2006-11-20
[PDF]
Karen J. Miemietz v. George J. Miemietz
that this court reviews de novo. State v. Edwards, 2003 WI 68, ¶7, 262 Wis. 2d 448, 665 N.W.2d 136
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6337 - 2017-09-19
that this court reviews de novo. State v. Edwards, 2003 WI 68, ¶7, 262 Wis. 2d 448, 665 N.W.2d 136
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6337 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Deborah J.Z.
—is an issue of statutory construction. Statutory construction is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11496 - 2017-09-19
—is an issue of statutory construction. Statutory construction is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11496 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Victor Naydihor
review de novo. State v. Church, 2002 WI App 212, ¶16, __ Wis. 2d __, 650 N.W.2d 873. ¶24 Naydihor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4610 - 2017-09-19
review de novo. State v. Church, 2002 WI App 212, ¶16, __ Wis. 2d __, 650 N.W.2d 873. ¶24 Naydihor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4610 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI 66
, 209 Wis. 2d 241, 243, 562 N.W.2d 137 (1997). We review the referee's conclusions of law on a de
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29263 - 2014-09-15
, 209 Wis. 2d 241, 243, 562 N.W.2d 137 (1997). We review the referee's conclusions of law on a de
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29263 - 2014-09-15
County of Ozaukee v. Nancy L. Quelle
of law which we review de novo. See State v. Hagaman, 133 Wis.2d 381, 384-85, 395 N.W.2d 617, 618 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8935 - 2005-03-31
of law which we review de novo. See State v. Hagaman, 133 Wis.2d 381, 384-85, 395 N.W.2d 617, 618 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8935 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the trial court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, but review de novo whether those facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93377 - 2013-02-27
the trial court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, but review de novo whether those facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93377 - 2013-02-27
[PDF]
WI APP 2
interpretation is generally a question of law that we review de novo. See Weston v. DWD, 2007 WI App 167, ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31093 - 2014-09-15
interpretation is generally a question of law that we review de novo. See Weston v. DWD, 2007 WI App 167, ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31093 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
of law that we review de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d 121, 128, 449 N.W.2d 845 (1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143066 - 2015-06-15
of law that we review de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d 121, 128, 449 N.W.2d 845 (1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143066 - 2015-06-15