Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24081 - 24090 of 29823 for des.
Search results 24081 - 24090 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
WI 54
as de minimis. ¶30 The legislature's choice of language in Wis. Stat. § 70.11(42)(a)2.a. further
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=375405 - 2021-06-08
as de minimis. ¶30 The legislature's choice of language in Wis. Stat. § 70.11(42)(a)2.a. further
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=375405 - 2021-06-08
[PDF]
Northern States Power Company v. National Gas Company, Inc.
627, 654, 517 N.W.2d 432, 443 (1994). We review questions of law de novo, while benefiting from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15609 - 2017-09-21
627, 654, 517 N.W.2d 432, 443 (1994). We review questions of law de novo, while benefiting from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15609 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and denying Elnimeiry’s motion to modify child support. ¶20 Elnimeiry timely moved for a de novo hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=773791 - 2024-03-07
and denying Elnimeiry’s motion to modify child support. ¶20 Elnimeiry timely moved for a de novo hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=773791 - 2024-03-07
State v. Harry L. Seymer
a defendant’s right of confrontation is a question of law that we review de novo. See Williams, 253 Wis. 2d 99
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17655 - 2005-05-24
a defendant’s right of confrontation is a question of law that we review de novo. See Williams, 253 Wis. 2d 99
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17655 - 2005-05-24
COURT OF APPEALS
the statutory standard is a question of law we review de novo. Buhler, 139 Wis. 2d at 198. “No motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144455 - 2015-07-14
the statutory standard is a question of law we review de novo. Buhler, 139 Wis. 2d at 198. “No motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144455 - 2015-07-14
William N. Ledford v. Circuit Court for Dane County
that we review de novo. See State ex rel. Richards v. Circuit Court, 165 Wis.2d 551, 554, 478 N.W.2d 29
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15358 - 2005-03-31
that we review de novo. See State ex rel. Richards v. Circuit Court, 165 Wis.2d 551, 554, 478 N.W.2d 29
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15358 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
a court has jurisdiction is a question of law we review de novo. Socha v. Socha, 183 Wis. 2d 390, 393
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64703 - 2011-06-28
a court has jurisdiction is a question of law we review de novo. Socha v. Socha, 183 Wis. 2d 390, 393
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64703 - 2011-06-28
2007 WI APP 193
review is de novo. The State concedes that Robinson labels the query a question of law, but notes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29733 - 2007-08-27
review is de novo. The State concedes that Robinson labels the query a question of law, but notes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29733 - 2007-08-27
Bradley A. Hackl v. Cody Hackl
reviews de novo. See Stockbridge Sch. Dist. v. Department of Pub. Instruction Sch. Dist. Boundary Appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15174 - 2005-03-31
reviews de novo. See Stockbridge Sch. Dist. v. Department of Pub. Instruction Sch. Dist. Boundary Appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15174 - 2005-03-31
Patricia K. Bernhardt v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
an employee engaged in misconduct under § 108.04(5) is a legal conclusion, which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10149 - 2005-03-31
an employee engaged in misconduct under § 108.04(5) is a legal conclusion, which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10149 - 2005-03-31