Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24081 - 24090 of 29823 for des.
Search results 24081 - 24090 of 29823 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
, 585 N.W.2d 640 (Ct. App. 1998). We apply these standards de novo to the Common Council’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72904 - 2011-10-26
, 585 N.W.2d 640 (Ct. App. 1998). We apply these standards de novo to the Common Council’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72904 - 2011-10-26
COURT OF APPEALS
of law for our de novo review. See State v. Harrell, 2008 WI App 37, ¶37, 308 Wis. 2d 166, 187, 747 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97330 - 2013-05-28
of law for our de novo review. See State v. Harrell, 2008 WI App 37, ¶37, 308 Wis. 2d 166, 187, 747 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97330 - 2013-05-28
Eugene B. Sherry v. Emile W. Salvo
, we apply the same methodology as the trial court,[3] and we consider the issues de novo. Green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10577 - 2005-03-31
, we apply the same methodology as the trial court,[3] and we consider the issues de novo. Green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10577 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
“acted according to law.” ¶8 Because our review of the Common Council’s decision is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70007 - 2014-09-15
“acted according to law.” ¶8 Because our review of the Common Council’s decision is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70007 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, subject to our de novo review.” Smith, 342 Wis. 2d 710, ¶24. When conducting our review, “we consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=958882 - 2025-05-20
, subject to our de novo review.” Smith, 342 Wis. 2d 710, ¶24. When conducting our review, “we consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=958882 - 2025-05-20
TFJ Nominee Trust v. State of Wisconsin Department of Transportation
Resolution of this appeal requires interpretation of Wis. Stat. § 32.05, a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2877 - 2005-03-31
Resolution of this appeal requires interpretation of Wis. Stat. § 32.05, a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2877 - 2005-03-31
James A. Rehrauer v. City of Milwaukee
we are assisted by the circuit court’s analysis, Welter, 214 Wis. 2d at 489, our review is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2875 - 2005-03-31
we are assisted by the circuit court’s analysis, Welter, 214 Wis. 2d at 489, our review is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2875 - 2005-03-31
State v. Calvin Pluim
of the magistrate’s probable cause determination is not de novo, even though it presents a question of law; rather, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15225 - 2005-03-31
of the magistrate’s probable cause determination is not de novo, even though it presents a question of law; rather, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15225 - 2005-03-31
State v. Maurice E. O'Neal
a question of constitutional fact which we review de novo. See Williams, 255 Wis. 2d 1, ¶17. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7095 - 2005-03-31
a question of constitutional fact which we review de novo. See Williams, 255 Wis. 2d 1, ¶17. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7095 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Benjamin J. Barney
the plea agreement was before or after “sentencing.” This is a question of law which we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11682 - 2017-09-19
the plea agreement was before or after “sentencing.” This is a question of law which we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11682 - 2017-09-19