Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24081 - 24090 of 61139 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 24081 - 24090 of 61139 for quit claim deed/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
entered an order on October 8, 2013, dismissing the Wickenhausers’ inverse condemnation claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142484 - 2015-05-26
entered an order on October 8, 2013, dismissing the Wickenhausers’ inverse condemnation claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142484 - 2015-05-26
Thomas R. Volden v. OKK Corporation
, OKK’s motion for JNOV on the strict liability claim and its contingent motion for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2703 - 2005-03-31
, OKK’s motion for JNOV on the strict liability claim and its contingent motion for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2703 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
she first learned that Gonzalez claimed to be at the house “a while ago,” but she did not tell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231264 - 2018-12-26
she first learned that Gonzalez claimed to be at the house “a while ago,” but she did not tell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231264 - 2018-12-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as witnesses. He also claims counsel was ineffective for failing to move to suppress a receipt and two gun
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174287 - 2017-09-21
as witnesses. He also claims counsel was ineffective for failing to move to suppress a receipt and two gun
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174287 - 2017-09-21
State v. Mark W. Roob
an order denying his postconviction motion. Roob claims: (1) there was insufficient evidence to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6366 - 2005-03-31
an order denying his postconviction motion. Roob claims: (1) there was insufficient evidence to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6366 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
brief-in-chief, the State argued that Voss’s claims in this appeal are procedurally barred under State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=784982 - 2024-04-04
brief-in-chief, the State argued that Voss’s claims in this appeal are procedurally barred under State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=784982 - 2024-04-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
entered an order on October 8, 2013, dismissing the Wickenhausers’ inverse condemnation claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142484 - 2017-09-21
entered an order on October 8, 2013, dismissing the Wickenhausers’ inverse condemnation claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142484 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶5 Manns subsequently filed a postconviction motion seeking plea withdrawal. He claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=378548 - 2021-06-22
. ¶5 Manns subsequently filed a postconviction motion seeking plea withdrawal. He claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=378548 - 2021-06-22
[PDF]
State v. Rock K. Ingram
of Ingram's appellate claims is that the trial court should have excluded the testimony from his parole
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9882 - 2017-09-19
of Ingram's appellate claims is that the trial court should have excluded the testimony from his parole
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9882 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Monica M. Blazekovic v. City of Milwaukee
as a result of the accident. In response, the insurers filed for summary judgment and claimed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17410 - 2017-09-21
as a result of the accident. In response, the insurers filed for summary judgment and claimed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17410 - 2017-09-21