Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24091 - 24100 of 29823 for des.
Search results 24091 - 24100 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
Rock County v. Amy L.
of law that we review de novo. Id. at 236-37, 548 N.W.2d at 76. The required test is that counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14168 - 2014-09-15
of law that we review de novo. Id. at 236-37, 548 N.W.2d at 76. The required test is that counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14168 - 2014-09-15
James R. Sakar v. Georgene Qureshi
denies a litigant a fair trial presents a legal issue which an appellate court determines de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7694 - 2005-03-31
denies a litigant a fair trial presents a legal issue which an appellate court determines de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7694 - 2005-03-31
State v. Willie D. Engram
that was prejudicial to the defendant is a constitutional issue that presents a question of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19892 - 2005-10-12
that was prejudicial to the defendant is a constitutional issue that presents a question of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19892 - 2005-10-12
Kathleen M. Taylor v. Marshall & Ilsley Trust Company
of the trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo, and we apply the same standards as did the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4440 - 2005-03-31
of the trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo, and we apply the same standards as did the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4440 - 2005-03-31
State v. Reginald R. Carter
to a constitutional standard is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Richardson, 156 Wis. 2d 128
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24868 - 2006-04-19
to a constitutional standard is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Richardson, 156 Wis. 2d 128
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24868 - 2006-04-19
COURT OF APPEALS
to support a conviction beyond a reasonable doubt is a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58135 - 2010-12-22
to support a conviction beyond a reasonable doubt is a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58135 - 2010-12-22
COURT OF APPEALS
. Standard of Review ¶10 We review summary judgments de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33294 - 2008-07-02
. Standard of Review ¶10 We review summary judgments de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33294 - 2008-07-02
State v. Michael A. DeLain
interpretation of § 940.22(2). Interpretation of a statute is a question of law that we review de novo. Johnson
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17911 - 2005-05-02
interpretation of § 940.22(2). Interpretation of a statute is a question of law that we review de novo. Johnson
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17911 - 2005-05-02
[PDF]
Frontsheet
, on a de novo basis. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Jennings, 2011 WI 45, ¶39, 334
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213302 - 2018-05-24
, on a de novo basis. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Jennings, 2011 WI 45, ¶39, 334
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213302 - 2018-05-24
Kenneth Belongia v. Wisconsin Insurance Security Fund
. We conclude that our review is de novo, and we will not defer to the fund's interpretation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7715 - 2005-03-31
. We conclude that our review is de novo, and we will not defer to the fund's interpretation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7715 - 2005-03-31