Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24091 - 24100 of 29823 for des.
Search results 24091 - 24100 of 29823 for des.
Craig I. Halverson v. June E. Halverson
is a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. Hokin, 231 Wis. 2d at 191 ¶9. ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2801 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. Hokin, 231 Wis. 2d at 191 ¶9. ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2801 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Brakebush Brothers, Inc. v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
95-2586 7 are not bound by LIRC’s legal conclusions and review them de novo. Kelley Co., Inc
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17059 - 2017-09-21
95-2586 7 are not bound by LIRC’s legal conclusions and review them de novo. Kelley Co., Inc
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17059 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Individual Subpoenaed to Appear at Waukesha County John Doe Case No. 2003 JD 001 v. J. Mac Davis
in a John Doe proceeding. These are questions of statutory interpretation which this court reviews de
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18502 - 2017-09-21
in a John Doe proceeding. These are questions of statutory interpretation which this court reviews de
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18502 - 2017-09-21
County of Ozaukee v. Nancy L. Quelle
of law which we review de novo. See State v. Hagaman, 133 Wis.2d 381, 384-85, 395 N.W.2d 617, 618 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8935 - 2005-03-31
of law which we review de novo. See State v. Hagaman, 133 Wis.2d 381, 384-85, 395 N.W.2d 617, 618 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8935 - 2005-03-31
Erik Jensen v. David D. McPherson, M.D.
involves the interpretation of a statute, a question of law which we review de novo. See Agnes T. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4533 - 2005-03-31
involves the interpretation of a statute, a question of law which we review de novo. See Agnes T. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4533 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, Lakeland Leisure, and State Farm Auto. We review de novo the grant or denial of summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69330 - 2011-08-08
, Lakeland Leisure, and State Farm Auto. We review de novo the grant or denial of summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69330 - 2011-08-08
[PDF]
WI App 38
interpretation and application are matters of law we review de novo. See Century Fence Co. v. American Sewer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=532085 - 2022-08-10
interpretation and application are matters of law we review de novo. See Century Fence Co. v. American Sewer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=532085 - 2022-08-10
WI App 150 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP310-CR Complete Title...
that this court reviews de novo. State v. Ziebart, 2003 WI App 258, ¶26, 268 Wis. 2d 468, 673 N.W.2d 369. ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103832 - 2013-12-17
that this court reviews de novo. State v. Ziebart, 2003 WI App 258, ¶26, 268 Wis. 2d 468, 673 N.W.2d 369. ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103832 - 2013-12-17
[PDF]
Arthur T. Donaldson v. Board of Commissioners of Rock-Koshkonong Lake District
of the statute by the Lake District Board. Because we employ a de novo standard, the standard most favorable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4711 - 2017-09-19
of the statute by the Lake District Board. Because we employ a de novo standard, the standard most favorable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4711 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo.” J.W.J., 375 Wis. 2d 542, ¶15. 6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1001570 - 2025-08-26
review de novo.” J.W.J., 375 Wis. 2d 542, ¶15. 6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1001570 - 2025-08-26