Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24091 - 24100 of 29823 for des.
Search results 24091 - 24100 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
State v. Donavan D. Theno
is a question of law which we review de novo without deference to the trial court’s conclusion. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16027 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law which we review de novo without deference to the trial court’s conclusion. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16027 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Calvin Pluim
cause determination is not de novo, even though it presents a question of law; rather, we give “great
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15225 - 2017-09-21
cause determination is not de novo, even though it presents a question of law; rather, we give “great
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15225 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the applicable legal standards is a question of law we review de novo. Therese B., 267 Wis. 2d 310, ¶21. B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220266 - 2018-10-03
the applicable legal standards is a question of law we review de novo. Therese B., 267 Wis. 2d 310, ¶21. B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220266 - 2018-10-03
State v. Darcy Stafford
that performance prejudiced the defense, are questions of law which we review de novo. State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11541 - 2005-03-31
that performance prejudiced the defense, are questions of law which we review de novo. State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11541 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
they are clearly erroneous. WIS. STAT. § 805.17(2). We review de novo the court’s application of those facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=967607 - 2025-06-11
they are clearly erroneous. WIS. STAT. § 805.17(2). We review de novo the court’s application of those facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=967607 - 2025-06-11
COURT OF APPEALS
. This is a question of law that [appellate courts] review de novo. If the motion raises such facts, the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63726 - 2011-05-09
. This is a question of law that [appellate courts] review de novo. If the motion raises such facts, the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63726 - 2011-05-09
COURT OF APPEALS
Evans’s testimony and only required that the jurors use their common sense, not medical knowledge. See De
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106756 - 2014-01-14
Evans’s testimony and only required that the jurors use their common sense, not medical knowledge. See De
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106756 - 2014-01-14
Milwaukee County v. Ronald L. Collison
procedure to challenge the policy. ¶16 This court reviews a summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24879 - 2006-04-24
procedure to challenge the policy. ¶16 This court reviews a summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24879 - 2006-04-24
John K. Bille v. Christine Zuraff
of law that we review de novo. See id. Classification of the residence determines whether Gloria could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8456 - 2005-03-31
of law that we review de novo. See id. Classification of the residence determines whether Gloria could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8456 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the defendant’s right to effective assistance of counsel is a legal determination, which this court decides de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190510 - 2017-09-21
the defendant’s right to effective assistance of counsel is a legal determination, which this court decides de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190510 - 2017-09-21