Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24091 - 24100 of 29823 for des.

[PDF] WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT
Voces de la Frontera, Inc v. Dave Gerber Does Wis. Stat. ch. 818 govern the authority of a sheriff
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1071210 - 2026-01-28

[PDF] Mary H. Staehler v. Jennifer L. Beuthin
that the plaintiff’s injuries were de minimis or nonexistent. Id. Here, the jury may well have concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10030 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Brennan v. Berner Cheese Corporation
summary judgments de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court. Machotka v. Village of West
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6899 - 2017-09-20

State v. Victor Naydihor
which we review de novo. State v. Church, 2002 WI App 212, ¶16, __ Wis. 2d __, 650 N.W.2d 873. ¶24
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4609 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
arguments are purely legal and we review such arguments de novo. To the extent Valek and Smith challenge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95615 - 2013-04-17

[PDF] WI 54
as de minimis. ¶30 The legislature's choice of language in Wis. Stat. § 70.11(42)(a)2.a. further
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=375405 - 2021-06-08

[PDF] Northern States Power Company v. National Gas Company, Inc.
627, 654, 517 N.W.2d 432, 443 (1994). We review questions of law de novo, while benefiting from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15609 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
and denying Elnimeiry’s motion to modify child support. ¶20 Elnimeiry timely moved for a de novo hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=773791 - 2024-03-07

State v. Harry L. Seymer
a defendant’s right of confrontation is a question of law that we review de novo. See Williams, 253 Wis. 2d 99
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17655 - 2005-05-24

COURT OF APPEALS
the statutory standard is a question of law we review de novo. Buhler, 139 Wis. 2d at 198. “No motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144455 - 2015-07-14