Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24091 - 24100 of 44189 for name change.
Search results 24091 - 24100 of 44189 for name change.
Jackson County v. State of Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
in reasonable reliance on the deed, and that a “mere change in title” is not sufficient to invoke the vested
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19930 - 2005-10-12
in reasonable reliance on the deed, and that a “mere change in title” is not sufficient to invoke the vested
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19930 - 2005-10-12
Bernard L. Beyer v. Stephen M. Puckett
of Offender Classification and Movement, improperly denied his request to change his security classification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3573 - 2005-03-31
of Offender Classification and Movement, improperly denied his request to change his security classification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3573 - 2005-03-31
State v. Latrice H.
academic”; it could not turn back the clock and effect a change in David’s placement “until March 30, 2001
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3776 - 2005-03-31
academic”; it could not turn back the clock and effect a change in David’s placement “until March 30, 2001
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3776 - 2005-03-31
State v. Paul L. George
representation. We are not persuaded that George's claimed change of heart, which is contradicted by the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10506 - 2005-03-31
representation. We are not persuaded that George's claimed change of heart, which is contradicted by the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10506 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and arguments regarding the merits. There has been no change since then that makes it fundamentally unfair
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48455 - 2010-03-29
and arguments regarding the merits. There has been no change since then that makes it fundamentally unfair
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48455 - 2010-03-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
because alternatives to jail had No. 2015AP880-CRNM 3 not caused Abramczak to change his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=151532 - 2017-09-21
because alternatives to jail had No. 2015AP880-CRNM 3 not caused Abramczak to change his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=151532 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that the court did not, as Bayrhoffer asserts, resentence him because it had changed its mind upon further
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103613 - 2017-09-21
that the court did not, as Bayrhoffer asserts, resentence him because it had changed its mind upon further
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103613 - 2017-09-21
Joel E. Bohringer v. Daniel J. Bohringer
in the decision we reversed in Bohringer I. Daniel contends that the court could not later change its finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8677 - 2005-03-31
in the decision we reversed in Bohringer I. Daniel contends that the court could not later change its finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8677 - 2005-03-31
State v. Daniel L. Hanson
merely changed his mind at a later date. This court is bound by the trial court’s findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4806 - 2005-03-31
merely changed his mind at a later date. This court is bound by the trial court’s findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4806 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Roger D. Erdman v. Gene Roets
the provisions of repealed ss. 893.16 (1) and 893.18 (1). A substantive change from prior law results
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9072 - 2017-09-19
the provisions of repealed ss. 893.16 (1) and 893.18 (1). A substantive change from prior law results
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9072 - 2017-09-19