Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2411 - 2420 of 91511 for 1.
Search results 2411 - 2420 of 91511 for 1.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1 1 All references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1026471 - 2025-10-21
. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1 1 All references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1026471 - 2025-10-21
State v. Richard E. Ziltener
County: michael j. byron, Judge. Affirmed. ROGGENSACK, J.[1] Richard E
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13849 - 2005-03-31
County: michael j. byron, Judge. Affirmed. ROGGENSACK, J.[1] Richard E
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13849 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Richard E. Ziltener
, Judge. Affirmed. ROGGENSACK, J.1 Richard E. Ziltener appeals the judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13849 - 2014-09-15
, Judge. Affirmed. ROGGENSACK, J.1 Richard E. Ziltener appeals the judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13849 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI App 57
. Reversed in part and cause remanded with directions. Before Stark, P.J., Hruz and Seidl, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246423 - 2019-11-07
. Reversed in part and cause remanded with directions. Before Stark, P.J., Hruz and Seidl, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246423 - 2019-11-07
[PDF]
WI 33
REVIEW of a decision of the Court of Appeals. Reversed. ¶1 JON P. WILCOX, J. This is a review
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28525 - 2014-09-15
REVIEW of a decision of the Court of Appeals. Reversed. ¶1 JON P. WILCOX, J. This is a review
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28525 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
City of Milwaukee v. Shirley A. Negley
. The Negleys claim that the trial court: (1) erred in holding that Mr. Negley was not entitled to a de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11004 - 2017-09-19
. The Negleys claim that the trial court: (1) erred in holding that Mr. Negley was not entitled to a de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11004 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
City of Milwaukee v. Clifford R. Negley
. The Negleys claim that the trial court: (1) erred in holding that Mr. Negley was not entitled to a de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11005 - 2017-09-19
. The Negleys claim that the trial court: (1) erred in holding that Mr. Negley was not entitled to a de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11005 - 2017-09-19
2007 WI APP 173
. ¶1 NETTESHEIM, J. As part of Richard G. Galvan’s bifurcated sentence for homicide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29398 - 2007-07-24
. ¶1 NETTESHEIM, J. As part of Richard G. Galvan’s bifurcated sentence for homicide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29398 - 2007-07-24
City of Milwaukee v. Clifford R. Negley
claim that the trial court: (1) erred in holding that Mr. Negley was not entitled to a de novo trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11005 - 2005-03-31
claim that the trial court: (1) erred in holding that Mr. Negley was not entitled to a de novo trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11005 - 2005-03-31
City of Milwaukee v. Shirley A. Negley
claim that the trial court: (1) erred in holding that Mr. Negley was not entitled to a de novo trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11004 - 2005-03-31
claim that the trial court: (1) erred in holding that Mr. Negley was not entitled to a de novo trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11004 - 2005-03-31