Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2411 - 2420 of 13655 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) Pintu Baja Fortress Double Door Wlingi Blitar.
Search results 2411 - 2420 of 13655 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) Pintu Baja Fortress Double Door Wlingi Blitar.
[PDF]
State v. Dennis Lee Londo
of a nearby house. She said that she saw a man standing close to the house’s back door. The officers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3842 - 2017-09-20
of a nearby house. She said that she saw a man standing close to the house’s back door. The officers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3842 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Christopher L. Logan
out of the door.” According to Groce, Huerta told them that their “suspect,” later identified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6854 - 2017-09-20
out of the door.” According to Groce, Huerta told them that their “suspect,” later identified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6854 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Richard John Vernon
of a nearby house. She said that she saw a man standing close to the house’s back door. The officers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4066 - 2017-09-20
of a nearby house. She said that she saw a man standing close to the house’s back door. The officers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4066 - 2017-09-20
State v. Christopher L. Logan
of the door.” According to Groce, Huerta told them that their “suspect,” later identified as Christopher
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6854 - 2005-03-31
of the door.” According to Groce, Huerta told them that their “suspect,” later identified as Christopher
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6854 - 2005-03-31
State v. Brian C. Wulff
to a new trial would violate the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17029 - 2005-03-31
to a new trial would violate the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17029 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that § 632.32(5)(i) does not permit this type of double reduction. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=446954 - 2021-10-28
that § 632.32(5)(i) does not permit this type of double reduction. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=446954 - 2021-10-28
Jeffrey Opichka v. Racine County
, on the other hand, received an improper double benefit according to the deputies: it not only recovered amounts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24711 - 2006-05-30
, on the other hand, received an improper double benefit according to the deputies: it not only recovered amounts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24711 - 2006-05-30
State v. Jerome L. Thoms
conviction was consecutive to the earlier sentence, it was inappropriate to give Thoms double credit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15297 - 2005-03-31
conviction was consecutive to the earlier sentence, it was inappropriate to give Thoms double credit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15297 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 14
that the evidence is double-hearsay—the officer’s statements of what the witness told him Williams said. ¶18
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44822 - 2014-09-15
that the evidence is double-hearsay—the officer’s statements of what the witness told him Williams said. ¶18
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44822 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
charged the same attempted act of sexual intercourse in violation of the double jeopardy clause. ¶20
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81178 - 2014-09-15
charged the same attempted act of sexual intercourse in violation of the double jeopardy clause. ¶20
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81178 - 2014-09-15