Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2411 - 2420 of 29984 for de.
Search results 2411 - 2420 of 29984 for de.
Timothy Wrase v. City of Neenah
with the Wrases. The City of Neenah sought a trial de novo. The circuit court first noted that even though
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13316 - 2005-03-31
with the Wrases. The City of Neenah sought a trial de novo. The circuit court first noted that even though
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13316 - 2005-03-31
Didion, Inc. v. Ervin Prohaska
on summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the trial court. See Armstrong v. Milwaukee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13348 - 2005-03-31
on summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the trial court. See Armstrong v. Milwaukee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13348 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Thomas Derse v. Leonard Hodera
802.08(2), STATS. We review a grant of summary judgment de novo by applying the same standards employed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8075 - 2017-09-19
802.08(2), STATS. We review a grant of summary judgment de novo by applying the same standards employed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8075 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Thomas C. Grohmann
of fact on appeal, ... the question is one of law to be reviewed de novo without deference to the lower
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9143 - 2017-09-19
of fact on appeal, ... the question is one of law to be reviewed de novo without deference to the lower
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9143 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
presents a question of law we review de novo. See Welin v. American Family Mut. Ins. Co., 2006 WI 81, ¶16
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60822 - 2011-03-08
presents a question of law we review de novo. See Welin v. American Family Mut. Ins. Co., 2006 WI 81, ¶16
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60822 - 2011-03-08
[PDF]
Beverly Drews v. Carol Marwede
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25891 - 2017-09-21
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25891 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
omitted). We review de novo whether a party has met its burden of establishing a prima facie case. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93293 - 2013-02-26
omitted). We review de novo whether a party has met its burden of establishing a prima facie case. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93293 - 2013-02-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
information at sentencing.” State v. Coffee, 2020 WI 1, ¶38, 389 Wis. 2d 627, 937 N.W.2d 579. We review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=993507 - 2025-08-07
information at sentencing.” State v. Coffee, 2020 WI 1, ¶38, 389 Wis. 2d 627, 937 N.W.2d 579. We review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=993507 - 2025-08-07
[PDF]
State v. Jacquelyn J. Dingeldein
, and therefore our review of the circuit court’s bindover decision is de novo. State v. Anderson, 2005 WI 54
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21632 - 2017-09-21
, and therefore our review of the circuit court’s bindover decision is de novo. State v. Anderson, 2005 WI 54
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21632 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
County of Waukesha v. Laura J. M.
. VAN DE WATER, Judge. Affirmed. No. 2005AP755 2 ¶1 SNYDER, J. 1 Laura J.M. appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19177 - 2017-09-21
. VAN DE WATER, Judge. Affirmed. No. 2005AP755 2 ¶1 SNYDER, J. 1 Laura J.M. appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19177 - 2017-09-21