Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24101 - 24110 of 29823 for des.

[PDF] State v. John S. Cooper
review de novo. See State v. Piddington, 2001 WI 24, ΒΆ13, 241 Wis. 2d 754, 623 N.W.2d 528, cert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5587 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] General Accident Insurance Company of America v. Schoendorf & Sorgi
judgment dismissing Quarles & Brady's contribution claim. Our review is de novo. Green Spring Farms v
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16932 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Hoey Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Ted Ricci
is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. All doubts on this issue are resolved in favor of the party
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4300 - 2017-09-19

Woody Howland v. BG Products, Inc.
such as Grams v. Boss, 97 Wis. 2d 332, 338, 294 N.W.2d 473 (1980). Our review is de novo and independent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15942 - 2005-03-31

Rock County v. Amy L.
of law that we review de novo. Id. at 236-37, 548 N.W.2d at 76. The required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14168 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Samuel Jones
we review de novo. See State v. Ziegenhagen, 73 Wis.2d 656, 664, 245 N.W.2d 656, 660 (1976
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12857 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
applied the correct legal standard is a question of law we decide de novo. Gittel v. Abram, 2002 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145492 - 2015-07-30

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
right to confrontation is an issue of constitutional law that this court reviews de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=939524 - 2025-04-10

Karen Lee Boldt v. James Edward Boldt, Jr.
of the frequent flier tickets. The trial court conducted a de novo hearing on November 18-19, 2004. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24826 - 2006-04-17

Mary Ann Jones v. The Estate of Robert G. Jones
interpretation and contract interpretation, which we review de novo, but benefiting from the circuit court's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16495 - 2005-03-31