Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24101 - 24110 of 41672 for jury duty/1000.
Search results 24101 - 24110 of 41672 for jury duty/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
accusation because she felt humiliated. The jury convicted Picotte of sexually assaulting Jennifer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86078 - 2014-09-15
accusation because she felt humiliated. The jury convicted Picotte of sexually assaulting Jennifer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86078 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
involving animals. However, the State dismissed seven counts at trial, and the jury acquitted her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149553 - 2017-09-21
involving animals. However, the State dismissed seven counts at trial, and the jury acquitted her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149553 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
) (2009-10),1 after a jury trial. We affirm the judgment of the circuit court. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85419 - 2014-09-15
) (2009-10),1 after a jury trial. We affirm the judgment of the circuit court. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85419 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 13, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
written statement that was presented to the jury. We do not repeat here the underlying facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28362 - 2007-03-12
written statement that was presented to the jury. We do not repeat here the underlying facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28362 - 2007-03-12
State v. Javier Salgado
assistance of trial counsel, we affirm.[2] I. BACKGROUND ¶2 On May 14, 1997, a jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2754 - 2005-03-31
assistance of trial counsel, we affirm.[2] I. BACKGROUND ¶2 On May 14, 1997, a jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2754 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
Hicks’s alibi defense, resulting in the jury finding him guilty. We conclude that trial counsel did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35052 - 2014-09-15
Hicks’s alibi defense, resulting in the jury finding him guilty. We conclude that trial counsel did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35052 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
in the grounds phase of a termination proceeding does not violate the parent’s right to a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55216 - 2014-09-15
in the grounds phase of a termination proceeding does not violate the parent’s right to a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55216 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
a jury trial of first-degree reckless homicide as a party to a crime. The court sentenced him to twenty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33726 - 2008-08-12
a jury trial of first-degree reckless homicide as a party to a crime. The court sentenced him to twenty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33726 - 2008-08-12
COURT OF APPEALS
I know is what I heard, the same thing the jury heard, which at the time was the officer’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35470 - 2009-02-09
I know is what I heard, the same thing the jury heard, which at the time was the officer’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35470 - 2009-02-09
State v. David G. Huusko
The jury acquitted Huusko of the Golden Express robbery but found him guilty of the SuperAmerica robbery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4582 - 2005-03-31
The jury acquitted Huusko of the Golden Express robbery but found him guilty of the SuperAmerica robbery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4582 - 2005-03-31