Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24111 - 24120 of 29821 for des.
Search results 24111 - 24120 of 29821 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
the trial court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, but review de novo whether those facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93377 - 2013-02-27
the trial court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, but review de novo whether those facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93377 - 2013-02-27
State v. John Patrick Feeney
the statute of limitations has expired presents us with a question of law we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20657 - 2005-12-19
the statute of limitations has expired presents us with a question of law we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20657 - 2005-12-19
WI App 75 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP2442 Complete Title of...
to defend, a question of law that we review de novo. See Estate of Sustache v. American Family Mut. Ins. Co
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83437 - 2012-07-26
to defend, a question of law that we review de novo. See Estate of Sustache v. American Family Mut. Ins. Co
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83437 - 2012-07-26
2007 WI APP 158
is de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315–317, 401 N.W.2d 816, 820–821 (1987
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29099 - 2007-06-26
is de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315–317, 401 N.W.2d 816, 820–821 (1987
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29099 - 2007-06-26
State v. Willie D. Engram
that was prejudicial to the defendant is a constitutional issue that presents a question of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19892 - 2005-10-12
that was prejudicial to the defendant is a constitutional issue that presents a question of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19892 - 2005-10-12
Lori B. v. Steven B.
injury. The interpretation of a statute is a question of law which we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14663 - 2005-03-31
injury. The interpretation of a statute is a question of law which we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14663 - 2005-03-31
Kathleen M. Taylor v. Marshall & Ilsley Trust Company
of the trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo, and we apply the same standards as did the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4440 - 2005-03-31
of the trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo, and we apply the same standards as did the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4440 - 2005-03-31
State v. Reginald R. Carter
to a constitutional standard is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Richardson, 156 Wis. 2d 128
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24868 - 2006-04-19
to a constitutional standard is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Richardson, 156 Wis. 2d 128
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24868 - 2006-04-19
COURT OF APPEALS
to support a conviction beyond a reasonable doubt is a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58135 - 2010-12-22
to support a conviction beyond a reasonable doubt is a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58135 - 2010-12-22
State v. David J. Cleveland
exists in a given case is a question of constitutional law which we review de novo.” Id. We analyze
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16108 - 2005-03-31
exists in a given case is a question of constitutional law which we review de novo.” Id. We analyze
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16108 - 2005-03-31