Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24111 - 24120 of 83389 for simple case search.
Search results 24111 - 24120 of 83389 for simple case search.
State v. William McCall
judge a drug case fairly. ¶5 Juror Denise Davis identified herself as a school
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2167 - 2005-03-31
judge a drug case fairly. ¶5 Juror Denise Davis identified herself as a school
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2167 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Court of Appeals procedures for expedited appeals
statement. See VII(2), below. VII. EXPEDITED APPEALS (1) Eligible Cases. All appeals in the Court
/courts/appeals/docs/expedited.pdf - 2021-10-28
statement. See VII(2), below. VII. EXPEDITED APPEALS (1) Eligible Cases. All appeals in the Court
/courts/appeals/docs/expedited.pdf - 2021-10-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
or a notice of appeal on the merits. The State took Rodgers into custody on January 21, 2020. In case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1007490 - 2025-09-05
or a notice of appeal on the merits. The State took Rodgers into custody on January 21, 2020. In case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1007490 - 2025-09-05
State v. Thomas F.w.
argues that the appeal is moot because the order appealed from expired on January 4, 1996. A case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9582 - 2005-03-31
argues that the appeal is moot because the order appealed from expired on January 4, 1996. A case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9582 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
or a notice of appeal on the merits. The State took Rodgers into custody on January 21, 2020. In case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1007490 - 2025-09-05
or a notice of appeal on the merits. The State took Rodgers into custody on January 21, 2020. In case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1007490 - 2025-09-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2018AP2145-CR 2 our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248682 - 2019-10-16
. No. 2018AP2145-CR 2 our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248682 - 2019-10-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
did not adequately explain its decision; (2) the number of hours the attorneys worked on the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112784 - 2017-09-21
did not adequately explain its decision; (2) the number of hours the attorneys worked on the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112784 - 2017-09-21
State v. Robert W. Thurston
incident in the civil case. He asserted that the State was precluded from bringing criminal charges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12426 - 2005-03-31
incident in the civil case. He asserted that the State was precluded from bringing criminal charges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12426 - 2005-03-31
State v. Andrew D. Birmingham
. Birmingham submit to a PBT.” The court reasoned the “PBT did exactly what it was supposed to do in cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18733 - 2005-06-28
. Birmingham submit to a PBT.” The court reasoned the “PBT did exactly what it was supposed to do in cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18733 - 2005-06-28
[PDF]
WI 103
2012 WI 103 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2012AP566-J COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85639 - 2014-09-15
2012 WI 103 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2012AP566-J COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85639 - 2014-09-15