Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24121 - 24130 of 83945 for case search.

[PDF] 2023AP001399 - Motion of Wisconsin Legislature, Republican Senator Respondents, and Intervenors-Respondents Billie Johnson et al. for reconsideration of 12-22-23 decision and scheduling order
Case 2023AP001399 Motion of Wisconsin Legislature, Republican Senator ... Filed 12-28-2023 Page 1 of 7
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_12291mrc.pdf - 2024-01-02

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
remained presumed innocent and stated multiple times that “each case is different.” The circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1094777 - 2026-03-24

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
against admission of the evidence mainly on the basis that, at that time, no Wisconsin case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1013584 - 2025-09-25

[PDF] CA Blank Order
affirm the judgments. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. In Waukesha County Circuit Court Case No. 2018CF1660
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=983042 - 2025-07-16

[PDF] State v. Michael A. Senecal
AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY ¶3 The facts and procedural history of this case as they bear upon the appellate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3413 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Paul R. Benzel
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-3528-CR and 97-3529-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13346 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Barbara R.K. v. James G.
2002 WI App 47 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 01-1219
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3933 - 2017-09-20

CA Blank Order
a $250 DNA surcharge for the felony case and a $200 DNA surcharge for the misdemeanor case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=148198 - 2015-09-01

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
in the garage. One of the officers testified at the trial in this case that he did not see any person around
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123528 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
the trial court that it did need more time to consider the case. The trial court sent the jury back
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34159 - 2008-09-29