Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24121 - 24130 of 43189 for t o.
Search results 24121 - 24130 of 43189 for t o.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. at 690. To demonstrate prejudice, “[t]he defendant must show that there is a reasonable probability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77508 - 2014-09-15
. at 690. To demonstrate prejudice, “[t]he defendant must show that there is a reasonable probability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77508 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
not waive its jurisdiction. Fourth, Terrell argues that [i]t is pretzel logic of the first order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30127 - 2014-09-15
not waive its jurisdiction. Fourth, Terrell argues that [i]t is pretzel logic of the first order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30127 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and cause me to be arrested and possibly made a suspect [and] [t]hat because of these concerns, Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134123 - 2017-09-21
and cause me to be arrested and possibly made a suspect [and] [t]hat because of these concerns, Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134123 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 204
N.W.2d 627 (citing State v. Petty, 201 Wis. 2d 337, 347, 548 N.W.2d 817 (1996)). Further, “[t]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26538 - 2014-09-15
N.W.2d 627 (citing State v. Petty, 201 Wis. 2d 337, 347, 548 N.W.2d 817 (1996)). Further, “[t]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26538 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Douglass Potter
discretion in determining sentences, and “[t]he trial court is presumed to have acted reasonably.” State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6662 - 2017-09-20
discretion in determining sentences, and “[t]he trial court is presumed to have acted reasonably.” State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6662 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
be vacated. Id. at 154. The supreme court concluded that “[t]he jury was not instructed on [fellatio], so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27974 - 2014-09-15
be vacated. Id. at 154. The supreme court concluded that “[t]he jury was not instructed on [fellatio], so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27974 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Brent L. Barber
). The motion for a new trial is necessary because “[t]he trial court is in the best position to evaluate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11581 - 2017-09-19
). The motion for a new trial is necessary because “[t]he trial court is in the best position to evaluate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11581 - 2017-09-19
County of Rock v. Derek Valliant
T. Dillon, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 VERGERONT, J.[1] Derek Valliant appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6605 - 2005-03-31
T. Dillon, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 VERGERONT, J.[1] Derek Valliant appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6605 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 31, 2018 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216066 - 2018-07-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 31, 2018 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216066 - 2018-07-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the incident],” “[t]hey know it wasn’t him,” and, “[t]hey would have gave him 10 for his reckless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=982486 - 2025-07-15
of the incident],” “[t]hey know it wasn’t him,” and, “[t]hey would have gave him 10 for his reckless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=982486 - 2025-07-15