Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24131 - 24140 of 30246 for de.
Search results 24131 - 24140 of 30246 for de.
Michael S.B. v. Frederic J. Berns
interpretation of § 880.19, Stats. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8702 - 2005-03-31
interpretation of § 880.19, Stats. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8702 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. The [trial] court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164163 - 2017-09-21
entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. The [trial] court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164163 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
No. 2023AP650-CR 8 de novo. See State v. Vesper, 2018 WI App 31, ¶38, 382 Wis. 2d 207, 912 N.W.2d 418
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1047911 - 2025-12-09
No. 2023AP650-CR 8 de novo. See State v. Vesper, 2018 WI App 31, ¶38, 382 Wis. 2d 207, 912 N.W.2d 418
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1047911 - 2025-12-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment is generally discretionary, we review that decision de novo where “the exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=621715 - 2023-02-14
judgment is generally discretionary, we review that decision de novo where “the exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=621715 - 2023-02-14
[PDF]
State v. Robert L. King
a de novo standard on the second step. The reason we decided in Lopez to employ the “clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12523 - 2017-09-21
a de novo standard on the second step. The reason we decided in Lopez to employ the “clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12523 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
de novo. Osborn v. Bd. of Regents of Univ. of Wisconsin Sys., 2002 WI 83, ¶12, 254 Wis. 2d 266
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217079 - 2018-08-07
de novo. Osborn v. Bd. of Regents of Univ. of Wisconsin Sys., 2002 WI 83, ¶12, 254 Wis. 2d 266
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217079 - 2018-08-07
Prent Corporation v. Martek Holdings, Inc.
under a written document is a question of law that we review de novo. See Edwards v. Petrone, 160 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14896 - 2005-03-31
under a written document is a question of law that we review de novo. See Edwards v. Petrone, 160 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14896 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI App 110
standard is a question of law to which we give de novo review.” Bantz v. Montgomery Estates, Inc., 163
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32876 - 2014-09-15
standard is a question of law to which we give de novo review.” Bantz v. Montgomery Estates, Inc., 163
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32876 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Wisconsin Bell, Inc. v. Sheffield Systems, Inc.
. App. 1993). Our review is de novo. See Smith v. Katz, 218 Wis.2d 442, 447-48, 578 N.W.2d 202, 204
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12074 - 2017-09-21
. App. 1993). Our review is de novo. See Smith v. Katz, 218 Wis.2d 442, 447-48, 578 N.W.2d 202, 204
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12074 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law that this court reviews de novo. State v. Sulla, 2016 WI 46, ¶23, 369 Wis. 2d 225, 880 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=767596 - 2024-02-22
of law that this court reviews de novo. State v. Sulla, 2016 WI 46, ¶23, 369 Wis. 2d 225, 880 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=767596 - 2024-02-22