Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24131 - 24140 of 29827 for des.
Search results 24131 - 24140 of 29827 for des.
[PDF]
Nancy Kosloske v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation
court's ruling de novo, arguing that it involves interpreting a statute—§ 908.045(1), STATS.— which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7808 - 2017-09-19
court's ruling de novo, arguing that it involves interpreting a statute—§ 908.045(1), STATS.— which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7808 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Frontsheet
erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Eisenberg
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=312507 - 2020-12-09
erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Eisenberg
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=312507 - 2020-12-09
[PDF]
State v. Timothy T. Clark
we review de novo.” Id. (citing State v. Guzman, 166 Wis. 2d 577, 586, 480 N.W.2d 446 (1992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5570 - 2017-09-19
we review de novo.” Id. (citing State v. Guzman, 166 Wis. 2d 577, 586, 480 N.W.2d 446 (1992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5570 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d 303, 310, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996). If the motion raises
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93205 - 2014-09-15
review de novo. State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d 303, 310, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996). If the motion raises
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93205 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Kevin L. McCullough
, which we review de novo based on the facts as found by the circuit court. Morgan, 254 Wis. 2d 602
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19807 - 2017-09-21
, which we review de novo based on the facts as found by the circuit court. Morgan, 254 Wis. 2d 602
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19807 - 2017-09-21
State v. Curtis M. Agacki
§ 905.04, Stats. The interpretation of a statute presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13317 - 2005-03-31
§ 905.04, Stats. The interpretation of a statute presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13317 - 2005-03-31
2007 WI APP 196
–124. Our review of Judge Murray’s interpretation and application of § 968.26 is de novo. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29722 - 2007-08-27
–124. Our review of Judge Murray’s interpretation and application of § 968.26 is de novo. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29722 - 2007-08-27
2007 WI APP 24
decide de novo. See Patrickus v. Patrickus, 2000 WI App 255, ¶6, 239 Wis. 2d 340, 620 N.W.2d 205. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27899 - 2007-02-27
decide de novo. See Patrickus v. Patrickus, 2000 WI App 255, ¶6, 239 Wis. 2d 340, 620 N.W.2d 205. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27899 - 2007-02-27
State v. Charles Chvala
The issue of the proper interpretation of Wis. Stat. § 757.13 presents a question of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6287 - 2005-03-31
The issue of the proper interpretation of Wis. Stat. § 757.13 presents a question of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6287 - 2005-03-31
State v. Joseph C. Frey
the defendant is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. A defendant is prejudiced if he or she can
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8721 - 2005-03-31
the defendant is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. A defendant is prejudiced if he or she can
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8721 - 2005-03-31