Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24131 - 24140 of 45879 for paternity test paper work.

[PDF] Case of the month November 2009
. A decision by the Supreme Court could clarify the proper formulation of the single-subject test and provide
/courts/resources/teacher/casemonth/docs/nov09.pdf - 2010-01-20

[PDF] May 2009 Published Orders
2008AP000484 2009 WI App 62 Industrial Risk Insurers v. American Engineering Testing, Inc. 2008AP000947 2009
/ca/pub/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36642 - 2014-09-15

State v. James A. Munsch
“was admissible because it met the constitutional requirements for warrantless blood tests set out in [State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15768 - 2005-03-31

State v. Troy R. Haakenstad
“The test for harmless error is whether there is a reasonable possibility that the error contributed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15258 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
that the officer lacked probable cause to request a preliminary breath test. We disagree. The officer testified
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91217 - 2013-01-01

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, 2012. At the time of his birth, he tested positive for Subutex and Clonazepam, suffered from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=152379 - 2017-09-21

State v. Robert D. Moss
Amendment claim. It asks us to evaluate Moss’s entitlement to do so by applying the six-factor test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3436 - 2005-03-31

State v. Kevin S. Meehan
erroneously exercised its discretion in allowing in the other acts evidence, we apply a three-step test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13461 - 2005-03-31

Richard W. Ziervogel v. Washington County Board of Adjustment
use of the property" test. The denial was upheld on certiorari review and appeal. Because we now
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16640 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Richard W. Ziervogel v. Washington County Board of Adjustment
to meet Kenosha County's restrictive "no reasonable use of the property" test. The denial was upheld
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16640 - 2017-09-21