Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24131 - 24140 of 63976 for records/1000.
Search results 24131 - 24140 of 63976 for records/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
are to the 2023-24 version. No. 2025AP531 2 and the record, this court concludes that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1054282 - 2025-12-23
are to the 2023-24 version. No. 2025AP531 2 and the record, this court concludes that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1054282 - 2025-12-23
COURT OF APPEALS
, and that the record does not support the Solises’ claim for a prescriptive easement. Accordingly, we reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36615 - 2009-05-27
, and that the record does not support the Solises’ claim for a prescriptive easement. Accordingly, we reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36615 - 2009-05-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to respond, and has responded. We have independently reviewed the record, the no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=759443 - 2024-02-06
to respond, and has responded. We have independently reviewed the record, the no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=759443 - 2024-02-06
[PDF]
Alec T. Ellsworth v. Laurie R. Ellsworth
. 1999). We examine the record to determine if the court applied the proper legal standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6252 - 2017-09-19
. 1999). We examine the record to determine if the court applied the proper legal standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6252 - 2017-09-19
State v. John E. Triplett
of an Alford plea.[1] On appeal, Triplett seeks to withdraw his plea based on his claim that the record before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12544 - 2005-03-31
of an Alford plea.[1] On appeal, Triplett seeks to withdraw his plea based on his claim that the record before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12544 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
reviewing the record, this court identified two defects in the circuit court’s plea colloquy, and we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=747456 - 2024-01-04
reviewing the record, this court identified two defects in the circuit court’s plea colloquy, and we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=747456 - 2024-01-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the entire record, as well as the no-merit report and response, we conclude that there are no arguably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=844437 - 2024-09-04
the entire record, as well as the no-merit report and response, we conclude that there are no arguably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=844437 - 2024-09-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162400 - 2017-09-21
. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162400 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
”; Lipsey’s institutional conduct record, which did not contain anything favorable or unfavorable to him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55648 - 2014-09-15
”; Lipsey’s institutional conduct record, which did not contain anything favorable or unfavorable to him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55648 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1065624 - 2026-01-21
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1065624 - 2026-01-21