Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24131 - 24140 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 24131 - 24140 of 58492 for speedy trial.
State v. Mark Inglin
. SCHUDSON, J. Mark Inglin appeals from the judgment of conviction, following a jury trial, for two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13173 - 2005-03-31
. SCHUDSON, J. Mark Inglin appeals from the judgment of conviction, following a jury trial, for two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13173 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Monroe County v. Jennifer V.
as an appeal was pending. The trial court concluded that a conviction was not a conviction within the meaning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9924 - 2017-09-19
as an appeal was pending. The trial court concluded that a conviction was not a conviction within the meaning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9924 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
-threatening injuries. The case went to trial with Powell facing three charges. Powell was acquitted of two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109569 - 2014-03-26
-threatening injuries. The case went to trial with Powell facing three charges. Powell was acquitted of two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109569 - 2014-03-26
[PDF]
State v. Eugene P. Opalewski
. No. 01-1864-CR 2 Opalewski asserts three claims of error: (1) the trial court erroneously exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4170 - 2017-09-20
. No. 01-1864-CR 2 Opalewski asserts three claims of error: (1) the trial court erroneously exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4170 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion. Dowling argued his trial counsel performed ineffectively by failing to seek suppression
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176706 - 2017-09-21
postconviction motion. Dowling argued his trial counsel performed ineffectively by failing to seek suppression
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176706 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI App 76
from the trial court’s denial of its motion seeking summary judgment on coverage. InsureMax contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36280 - 2014-09-15
from the trial court’s denial of its motion seeking summary judgment on coverage. InsureMax contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36280 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
of Virsnieks’s plea agreement.[3] ¶3 At the jury trial on the State’s Wis. Stat. ch. 980 petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66108 - 2011-06-20
of Virsnieks’s plea agreement.[3] ¶3 At the jury trial on the State’s Wis. Stat. ch. 980 petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66108 - 2011-06-20
Frontsheet
for Smith's trial. During this meeting, Attorney Lukoff learned, for the first time, that Simpson had met
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99750 - 2013-07-22
for Smith's trial. During this meeting, Attorney Lukoff learned, for the first time, that Simpson had met
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99750 - 2013-07-22
[PDF]
State v. Joel O. Peterson
Therefore, he asserts, the trial court lacked authority to sentence him as a repeater, even though
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3496 - 2017-09-19
Therefore, he asserts, the trial court lacked authority to sentence him as a repeater, even though
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3496 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Joshua Ferry
of Wisconsin appeals from a nonfinal trial court order suppressing evidence obtained during two searches
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8288 - 2017-09-19
of Wisconsin appeals from a nonfinal trial court order suppressing evidence obtained during two searches
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8288 - 2017-09-19