Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24141 - 24150 of 40091 for financial disclosure statement.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, August 14. After he was arrested, Warrix made several statements to the police. On October 6, 2016
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=531414 - 2022-06-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
be a factor in Abeyta’s decision to plead. ¶12 Abeyta argues that, because of his statements during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=686135 - 2023-08-03

Sauk County Department of Human Services v. Jody L. C.-P.
statement from the evaluator, stating that Jody fully understands the dynamics of domestic abuse and how she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7083 - 2005-03-31

Ozaukee County v. Perry P. Lieuallen
statement to the officer after failing the breath test that it was “bad, bad,” that he was going to have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15346 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Rueben Gantt
that the converse of a statement is necessarily true or intended or because X is included in Z that Y
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9642 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
then arrested Smith based on the statement of the loss prevention employee. Christopher Kmoch, a senior
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183299 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
rampage. The evidence at trial included the testimony and prior statements of the victims, testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213114 - 2018-05-23

[PDF] NOTICE
finding. ¶15 Finally, Crystal seems to be arguing that the circuit court’s statement that “I don’t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32459 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
and making up everything in order to get attention.” L.C. agreed that she had made that statement to her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90571 - 2014-09-15

State v. Bruce H. Manke
-sentence assertion that affirmance is required as a result of our statement in City of Waupaca v. Javorski
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15815 - 2005-03-31