Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24141 - 24150 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 24141 - 24150 of 58492 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 19, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
and thereby violated his right to due process; (2) he was entitled to a hearing on the issue; (3) his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62908 - 2011-04-18
and thereby violated his right to due process; (2) he was entitled to a hearing on the issue; (3) his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62908 - 2011-04-18
[PDF]
State v. Jeremy T. Greer
an order suppressing Jeremy T. Greer’s post-polygraph confession. The trial court held that Greer’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4421 - 2017-09-19
an order suppressing Jeremy T. Greer’s post-polygraph confession. The trial court held that Greer’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4421 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is entitled to withdraw his plea because trial counsel was ineffective for not seeking to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=663723 - 2023-06-02
is entitled to withdraw his plea because trial counsel was ineffective for not seeking to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=663723 - 2023-06-02
COURT OF APPEALS
m. flancher, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 ANDERSON, P.J.[1] Bryant A. claims his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35018 - 2008-12-29
m. flancher, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 ANDERSON, P.J.[1] Bryant A. claims his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35018 - 2008-12-29
State v. Jeremy T. Greer
confession. The trial court held that Greer’s statement, although voluntary, “improperly related back
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4421 - 2005-03-31
confession. The trial court held that Greer’s statement, although voluntary, “improperly related back
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4421 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Amado Saldana, Jr.
earlier because he was represented by the same counsel at trial and at the postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2893 - 2017-09-19
earlier because he was represented by the same counsel at trial and at the postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2893 - 2017-09-19
State v. Jeffery A. Keeran
, all as party to the crime. Keeran makes three arguments on appeal: (1) that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4180 - 2005-03-31
, all as party to the crime. Keeran makes three arguments on appeal: (1) that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4180 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
James Komarek v. Wisconsin Valley Improvement Co., Inc.
They argue that the trial court erroneously applied the doctrine of issue preclusion and improperly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2609 - 2017-09-19
They argue that the trial court erroneously applied the doctrine of issue preclusion and improperly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2609 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Gary Tate v. David H. Schwarz
1996. He denied guilt. On December 8, 1998, following a jury trial, Tate was convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2709 - 2017-09-19
1996. He denied guilt. On December 8, 1998, following a jury trial, Tate was convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2709 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
to suppression of the evidence. ¶4 The trial court denied Ehret’s suppression motion after an evidentiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49063 - 2010-04-20
to suppression of the evidence. ¶4 The trial court denied Ehret’s suppression motion after an evidentiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49063 - 2010-04-20