Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24161 - 24170 of 28758 for f.
Search results 24161 - 24170 of 28758 for f.
State v. Michele M. Rathke
809.23(1)(b)4. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(f), (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4284 - 2005-03-31
809.23(1)(b)4. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(f), (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4284 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
for Milwaukee County: rebecca f. dallet, Judge. Affirmed. Before Curley, P.J., Fine and Kessler
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85628 - 2012-07-30
for Milwaukee County: rebecca f. dallet, Judge. Affirmed. Before Curley, P.J., Fine and Kessler
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85628 - 2012-07-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
explained his need for more time to respond to the State’s motion as follows: “[F]or some reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=631344 - 2023-03-09
explained his need for more time to respond to the State’s motion as follows: “[F]or some reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=631344 - 2023-03-09
[PDF]
Daniel A. Ladwig v. Cheryl Ladwig
; (e) The judgment has been satisfied, released or discharged; (f) A prior judgment upon which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8951 - 2017-09-19
; (e) The judgment has been satisfied, released or discharged; (f) A prior judgment upon which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8951 - 2017-09-19
State v. Louis Taylor
upon the above testimony, the trial court found: [F]irst of all, I think the officer had a duty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13837 - 2005-03-31
upon the above testimony, the trial court found: [F]irst of all, I think the officer had a duty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13837 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
guardianship and custody. See Bach v. Milwaukee Cty. Circuit Court, 565 F. App’x 531, 532 (7th Cir. 2014
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180527 - 2017-09-21
guardianship and custody. See Bach v. Milwaukee Cty. Circuit Court, 565 F. App’x 531, 532 (7th Cir. 2014
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180527 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
of the police securing a search warrant. Miscichoski told LaVoy: “[i]f I don’t get consent, you know, I can go
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79066 - 2012-03-05
of the police securing a search warrant. Miscichoski told LaVoy: “[i]f I don’t get consent, you know, I can go
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79066 - 2012-03-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
1 The Honorable William F. Hue initially presided over the proceedings in this action. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177123 - 2017-09-21
1 The Honorable William F. Hue initially presided over the proceedings in this action. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177123 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
denying a motion to suppress evidence, “[f]irst, we review the circuit court’s findings of historical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134506 - 2017-09-21
denying a motion to suppress evidence, “[f]irst, we review the circuit court’s findings of historical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134506 - 2017-09-21
State v. Louis Taylor
upon the above testimony, the trial court found: [F]irst of all, I think the officer had a duty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13838 - 2005-03-31
upon the above testimony, the trial court found: [F]irst of all, I think the officer had a duty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13838 - 2005-03-31