Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24161 - 24170 of 58253 for speedy trial.
Search results 24161 - 24170 of 58253 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Paul R. Benzel
rights and ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court denied the motion, concluding that State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13346 - 2017-09-21
rights and ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court denied the motion, concluding that State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13346 - 2017-09-21
LaVerne Swanson v. Ronald W. Nelson
Swanson $4,000 damages and dismissing Nelson's counterclaim. Nelson argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10954 - 2005-03-31
Swanson $4,000 damages and dismissing Nelson's counterclaim. Nelson argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10954 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Kevin Radman v. Darlene Gustafson
and Kevin Radman. Gustafson argues that the trial court’s finding that the parties had no meeting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4225 - 2017-09-19
and Kevin Radman. Gustafson argues that the trial court’s finding that the parties had no meeting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4225 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Heather M. M.
an order adjudicating her delinquent. She claims that the trial court erred in concluding that it lacked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4002 - 2017-09-20
an order adjudicating her delinquent. She claims that the trial court erred in concluding that it lacked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4002 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Alvernice O. Sellers
). ¶3 Sellers contends that he is entitled to a new trial because the State failed to disclose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6698 - 2017-09-20
). ¶3 Sellers contends that he is entitled to a new trial because the State failed to disclose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6698 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for postconviction relief. Miller seeks either a new trial or resentencing. We reject his arguments and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94773 - 2014-09-15
for postconviction relief. Miller seeks either a new trial or resentencing. We reject his arguments and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94773 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
that the officers lacked reasonable suspicion to believe he was driving. The trial court granted the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29589 - 2014-09-15
that the officers lacked reasonable suspicion to believe he was driving. The trial court granted the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29589 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Amany E.
which adjudicated her delinquent. She claims the trial court erred in concluding that it lacked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2244 - 2017-09-19
which adjudicated her delinquent. She claims the trial court erred in concluding that it lacked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2244 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
] postconviction motion. The trial court denied Addison’s motion as procedurally barred by State v. Escalona
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39487 - 2009-08-17
] postconviction motion. The trial court denied Addison’s motion as procedurally barred by State v. Escalona
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39487 - 2009-08-17
Laura Ford v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
$150,000 for loss of consortium. The trial court denied Wal-Mart’s post-verdict motions, and it appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11051 - 2005-03-31
$150,000 for loss of consortium. The trial court denied Wal-Mart’s post-verdict motions, and it appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11051 - 2005-03-31