Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24171 - 24180 of 29713 for des.
Search results 24171 - 24180 of 29713 for des.
State v. Peter R. Martel
-offender registration, which is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Oakley, 2000 WI 37, ¶6
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16639 - 2005-03-31
-offender registration, which is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Oakley, 2000 WI 37, ¶6
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16639 - 2005-03-31
Sande D.-O. v. Paul E.K.
we review de novo. Rhonda R.D. v. Franklin R.D., 191 Wis.2d 680, 703, 530 N.W.2d 34, 43 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12746 - 2005-03-31
we review de novo. Rhonda R.D. v. Franklin R.D., 191 Wis.2d 680, 703, 530 N.W.2d 34, 43 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12746 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Michael B. Borhegyi
of constitutional dimensions which is reviewed de novo. State v. Ziegenhagen, 73 Wis.2d 656, 664, 245 N.W.2d 656
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13676 - 2017-09-21
of constitutional dimensions which is reviewed de novo. State v. Ziegenhagen, 73 Wis.2d 656, 664, 245 N.W.2d 656
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13676 - 2017-09-21
Lawrence A. Kruckenberg v. Paul S. Harvey
grant of summary judgment based on claim or issue preclusion is de novo. See Northern States Power Co
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6655 - 2005-03-31
grant of summary judgment based on claim or issue preclusion is de novo. See Northern States Power Co
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6655 - 2005-03-31
Eli Mendez v. BG Products, Inc.
such as Grams v. Boss, 97 Wis. 2d 332, 338, 294 N.W.2d 473 (1980). Our review is de novo and independent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15943 - 2005-03-31
such as Grams v. Boss, 97 Wis. 2d 332, 338, 294 N.W.2d 473 (1980). Our review is de novo and independent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15943 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Frontsheet
they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105627 - 2017-09-21
they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105627 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Glenn E. Davis
of law subject to de novo review. See Maday, 179 Wis. 2d at 353. ¶5 We begin our discussion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3197 - 2017-09-19
of law subject to de novo review. See Maday, 179 Wis. 2d at 353. ¶5 We begin our discussion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3197 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
requirements presents a question of law we review de novo. Id. ¶18 Pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 51.20(1)(a)2.c
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=317998 - 2020-12-23
requirements presents a question of law we review de novo. Id. ¶18 Pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 51.20(1)(a)2.c
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=317998 - 2020-12-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
counsel’s performance was deficient and if so, prejudicial, are questions of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=151649 - 2017-09-21
counsel’s performance was deficient and if so, prejudicial, are questions of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=151649 - 2017-09-21
State v. James B. Williams
to be free from double jeopardy has been violated is a question of law that this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5785 - 2005-03-31
to be free from double jeopardy has been violated is a question of law that this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5785 - 2005-03-31