Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24191 - 24200 of 64166 for records.
Search results 24191 - 24200 of 64166 for records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
are to the 2015-16 version unless otherwise noted. No. 2015AP1793-CRNM 2 review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182450 - 2017-09-21
are to the 2015-16 version unless otherwise noted. No. 2015AP1793-CRNM 2 review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182450 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, No. 2012AP2211 2 517 N.W.2d 157 (1994). Based upon our review of the briefs and the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104017 - 2017-09-21
, No. 2012AP2211 2 517 N.W.2d 157 (1994). Based upon our review of the briefs and the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104017 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2015AP1411 2 RULE 809.21. Based upon our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165033 - 2017-09-21
. No. 2015AP1411 2 RULE 809.21. Based upon our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165033 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196989 - 2017-09-27
of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196989 - 2017-09-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=650283 - 2023-05-03
review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=650283 - 2023-05-03
[PDF]
Scott Cecil v. KJH Enterprises, Inc.
of the proceedings. The record shows that the trial court rationally considered all of the No. 98-1483-FT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14062 - 2014-09-15
of the proceedings. The record shows that the trial court rationally considered all of the No. 98-1483-FT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14062 - 2014-09-15
State v. Bart E. Jenson
an exercise of sentencing discretion if the record shows that the court examined the facts and articulated its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6382 - 2005-03-31
an exercise of sentencing discretion if the record shows that the court examined the facts and articulated its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6382 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
with Robert’s interpretation of § 769.611(1)(a). Furthermore, contrary to Robert’s assertion, the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26660 - 2006-10-02
with Robert’s interpretation of § 769.611(1)(a). Furthermore, contrary to Robert’s assertion, the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26660 - 2006-10-02
CA Blank Order
sentence due to new factors. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122818 - 2014-09-30
sentence due to new factors. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122818 - 2014-09-30
[PDF]
State v. Robert J. King
were adequate and whether the sentence was excessive. Upon review of the record, we are satisfied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11235 - 2017-09-19
were adequate and whether the sentence was excessive. Upon review of the record, we are satisfied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11235 - 2017-09-19